[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1905: CLOUDSTACK-9738: Optimize vm expunge process for ins...

2017-02-06 Thread karuturi
Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1905 Hi @nvazquez Did the behavior in step2 change with this PR or is it same as earlier? Can you please add the testing already done? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1905: CLOUDSTACK-9738: Optimize vm expunge process for ins...

2017-02-03 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1905 Trillian test result (tid-800) Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 32817 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueoranguta

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1905: CLOUDSTACK-9738: Optimize vm expunge process for ins...

2017-02-02 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1905 @karuturi a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1905: CLOUDSTACK-9738: Optimize vm expunge process for ins...

2017-02-02 Thread karuturi
Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1905 @blueorangutan test --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1905: CLOUDSTACK-9738: Optimize vm expunge process for ins...

2017-02-02 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1905 Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-469 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1905: CLOUDSTACK-9738: Optimize vm expunge process for ins...

2017-02-02 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1905 @karuturi a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply a

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1905: CLOUDSTACK-9738: Optimize vm expunge process for ins...

2017-02-02 Thread karuturi
Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1905 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wis

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1905: CLOUDSTACK-9738: Optimize vm expunge process for ins...

2017-01-31 Thread nvazquez
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1905 @karuturi sure, done! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wish

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1905: CLOUDSTACK-9738: Optimize vm expunge process for ins...

2017-01-30 Thread karuturi
Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1905 There are some conflicts after the latest merge. Can you resolve them? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1905: CLOUDSTACK-9738: Optimize vm expunge process for ins...

2017-01-27 Thread serg38
Github user serg38 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1905 @rhtyd @karuturi Can we run tests on this PR and merge on success ? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1905: CLOUDSTACK-9738: Optimize vm expunge process for ins...

2017-01-18 Thread nvazquez
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1905 @ozhanrk nice, then this PR shouldn't affect your workflow --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1905: CLOUDSTACK-9738: Optimize vm expunge process for ins...

2017-01-18 Thread ozhanrk
Github user ozhanrk commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1905 Hi @nvazquez; You are right i am referring to volume based snapshots. Thanks --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub a

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1905: CLOUDSTACK-9738: Optimize vm expunge process for ins...

2017-01-18 Thread nvazquez
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1905 Hi @ozhanrk, In this PR, vm snapshots get deleted when the instance gets deleted from hypervisor, on task sent by the vm cleanup thread. Can it be possible that you were referring to

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1905: CLOUDSTACK-9738: Optimize vm expunge process for ins...

2017-01-15 Thread ozhanrk
Github user ozhanrk commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1905 Hi, we currently hold vm snapshots like as vm backup, even if we destroy vm with expunge. So that we could restore vm snapshot on future time. Does this pr has any effect on our scenario? ---