[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.6][BLOCKER]CLOUDSTACK-8763: Resolved P...

2015-09-23 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/845 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.6][BLOCKER]CLOUDSTACK-8763: Resolved P...

2015-09-23 Thread wilderrodrigues
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/845#issuecomment-142570859 Okay... we got 2 LGTM with proper testing/reporting. Thanks guys for taking your time to look into it. ping @borisroman @remibergsma @karuturi @wido

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.6][BLOCKER]CLOUDSTACK-8763: Resolved P...

2015-09-23 Thread karuturi
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/845#issuecomment-142520701 I am not merging this as I see a -1 from @wilderrodrigues @wilderrodrigues, unittests are added and steps to test are also available. Can you review again?

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.6][BLOCKER]CLOUDSTACK-8763: Resolved P...

2015-09-23 Thread karuturi
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/845#issuecomment-142520584 Tested this on a xenserver 6.5 setup. delete host/storage pool/cluster/pod/network/zone are all successful. :+1: --- If your project is set up for it,

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.6][BLOCKER]CLOUDSTACK-8763: Resolved P...

2015-09-17 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/845#issuecomment-140983817 @borisroman Please ping me if this PR is ready to be tested. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.6][BLOCKER]CLOUDSTACK-8763: Resolved P...

2015-09-17 Thread borisroman
Github user borisroman commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/845#discussion_r39714178 --- Diff: engine/schema/src/com/cloud/network/dao/IPAddressDaoImpl.java --- @@ -282,6 +289,14 @@ public IPAddressVO findByVmIp(String vmIp) {

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.6][BLOCKER]CLOUDSTACK-8763: Resolved P...

2015-09-17 Thread borisroman
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/845#issuecomment-141022408 @remibergsma @wilderrodrigues @karuturi Please review! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.6][BLOCKER]CLOUDSTACK-8763: Resolved P...

2015-09-17 Thread DaanHoogland
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/845#issuecomment-141057501 @borisroman there are no (unit) tests. can you add or describe or at least how to prove this fix? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.6][BLOCKER]CLOUDSTACK-8763: Resolved P...

2015-09-17 Thread borisroman
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/845#issuecomment-141059956 @DaanHoogland That was also one of my questions on Slack. There are no Unit tests regarding Dao classes in /cloud-engine-schema/test/. So how do I test these?

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.6][BLOCKER]CLOUDSTACK-8763: Resolved P...

2015-09-17 Thread DaanHoogland
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/845#issuecomment-141061213 @borisroman so please add a description of your manual test scheme in the description area of this PR ( and help us think of a better dao implementation ;)

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.6][BLOCKER]CLOUDSTACK-8763: Resolved P...

2015-09-17 Thread wilderrodrigues
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/845#issuecomment-141090948 :-1: until we get steps to test it. Cheers, Wilder --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.6][BLOCKER]CLOUDSTACK-8763: Resolved P...

2015-09-17 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/845#issuecomment-141124718 @borisroman Just successfully deleted a POD and a ZONE. ![screen shot 2015-09-17 at 17 02

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.6][BLOCKER]CLOUDSTACK-8763: Resolved P...

2015-09-17 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/845#issuecomment-141086717 Hi @borisroman I deployed a DC and then added an extra POD. Then without creating even a cluster, tried to delete it. It failed saying: ``` The pod

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.6][BLOCKER]CLOUDSTACK-8763: Resolved P...

2015-09-17 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/845#issuecomment-141175510 @wilderrodrigues The steps to test this are simply creating a POD, then deleting it. It fails in current master and succeeds in this PR. Same with a zone. If

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.6][BLOCKER]CLOUDSTACK-8763: Resolved P...

2015-09-17 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/845#issuecomment-141170729 For the record, I tested against fa5f388fe91bc2fd477b1f6752c2a31ac69d5051. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.6][BLOCKER]CLOUDSTACK-8763: Resolved P...

2015-09-16 Thread borisroman
GitHub user borisroman opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/845 [4.6][BLOCKER]CLOUDSTACK-8763: Resolved POD/ZONE deletion failure. Instead of having both checkIfPodIsDeletable() and checkIfZoneIsDeletable have there own SQL query, I've refactored them so