Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/701#issuecomment-131756869
LGTM. one note of worry though. removing the configuration item is arguably
a backwards incompatible change to the interface. I don't object to it, as
stated
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/701#issuecomment-131761320
Thanks for picking this up @koushik-das LGTM
@DaanHoogland I see your point, but the alternative is a setting that does
nothing. I think that is worse.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/701
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user koushik-das opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/701
CLOUDSTACK-8737: Remove out-of-band VR reboot code based on persistenâ¦
â¦t VR configuration changes
Removed out-of-band VR reboot code
Refer to the discussion on dev
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/701#issuecomment-131741834
@remibergsma @DaanHoogland Please review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
