[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9244 Fix setting up RFC1918 ro...

2016-01-20 Thread nislim
Github user nislim commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1352#issuecomment-173123805 Same result with the refactored code: ``` root@v-23-VM:~# route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9244 Fix setting up RFC1918 ro...

2016-01-20 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1352 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9244 Fix setting up RFC1918 ro...

2016-01-19 Thread DaanHoogland
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1352#issuecomment-172975452 If this helps @nislim And is tested it should go in. I feel uncertain of this functionality. It is called from sestro and console proxy setup functions but

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9244 Fix setting up RFC1918 ro...

2016-01-19 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1352#issuecomment-172977865 @DaanHoogland I think we agree cloud-early-config needs major refactoring as it is one big copy/paste thing. Just don't think this is the time to do it.

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9244 Fix setting up RFC1918 ro...

2016-01-19 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1352#issuecomment-173005222 `cloud-early-config` now logs: ``` Not setting up route of RFC1918 space to 192.168.22.1 befause 192.168.23.2 is RFC1918.. ``` Routes

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9244 Fix setting up RFC1918 ro...

2016-01-19 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1352#issuecomment-173002828 @nislim Can you please test the enhanced patch? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well.

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9244 Fix setting up RFC1918 ro...

2016-01-19 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1352#issuecomment-173002681 Discussed with @DaanHoogland and he sent me a patch ;-) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9244 Fix setting up RFC1918 ro...

2016-01-19 Thread DaanHoogland
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1352#discussion_r50168987 --- Diff: systemvm/patches/debian/config/etc/init.d/cloud-early-config --- @@ -1166,6 +1166,9 @@ setup_storage_network() { }

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9244 Fix setting up RFC1918 ro...

2016-01-19 Thread DaanHoogland
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1352#issuecomment-173112205 looks good --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9244 Fix setting up RFC1918 ro...

2016-01-19 Thread remibergsma
GitHub user remibergsma opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1352 CLOUDSTACK-9244 Fix setting up RFC1918 routes Public ip var was empty so routes were always set. Corrected this. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9244 Fix setting up RFC1918 ro...

2016-01-19 Thread nislim
Github user nislim commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1352#issuecomment-172929285 Fixed my problem, my routing tables are now looking as I expected. Thanks --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply