Github user rsafonseca commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/457#issuecomment-112080925
@DaanHoogland it's a fluke, sry :)
Must have typed wq1 instead of wq! on vi ... fixed and rebased
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/457#issuecomment-112071469
there's a new ParamProcessWorker class there (and .java file?) looks like
this is a commit fluke instead of a needed addition. please remove it.
---
If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/457
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user rsafonseca opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/457
Fix 2 findbugs STCAL_STATIC_SIMPLE_DATE_FORMAT_INSTANCE warnings in Bâ¦
â¦aseCmd.java
Dateformat objects are not thread safe. Instance field is highly
recommended for these
You
