[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: This is the fix for the JIRA issue CLOUDS...

2015-09-13 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/810 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: This is the fix for the JIRA issue CLOUDS...

2015-09-13 Thread ashwinswaroop
Github user ashwinswaroop commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/810#issuecomment-139910486 @rafaelweingartner I committed and pushed the new changes. I also changed the commit comment like you requested. --- If your project is set up for it, you

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: This is the fix for the JIRA issue CLOUDS...

2015-09-13 Thread rafaelweingartner
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/810#issuecomment-139913021 Now the change seems ok. I would just suggest you to squash the two commits, and fix the commit message (the first line of the comment is used to

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: This is the fix for the JIRA issue CLOUDS...

2015-09-13 Thread resmo
Github user resmo commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/810#issuecomment-139913727 LGTM. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: This is the fix for the JIRA issue CLOUDS...

2015-09-13 Thread rafaelweingartner
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/810#issuecomment-139914742 Automatically merged?!? I think it would be better to have merged, just after the squash --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: This is the fix for the JIRA issue CLOUDS...

2015-09-13 Thread ashwinswaroop
Github user ashwinswaroop commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/810#issuecomment-139927888 @resmo Do you know the reason for the 2 aborted messages above? Is there anything I should do? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: This is the fix for the JIRA issue CLOUDS...

2015-09-13 Thread rafaelweingartner
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/810#issuecomment-139921174 @ashwinswaroop, Well, now I have no idea what to do. Let’s hope someone with more experience reply to this thread. --- If your project is set up

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: This is the fix for the JIRA issue CLOUDS...

2015-09-13 Thread ashwinswaroop
Github user ashwinswaroop commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/810#issuecomment-139920903 @rafaelweingartner Okay so should I still squash the commits or leave it as it is since it says the pull request has been merged and closed? Also I received

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: This is the fix for the JIRA issue CLOUDS...

2015-09-13 Thread karuturi
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/810#issuecomment-139969167 builds were aborted probably because the PR was merged. This PR is properly merged to master with below commits * | | 120e1cc Merge pull request #810

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: This is the fix for the JIRA issue CLOUDS...

2015-09-11 Thread ashwinswaroop
GitHub user ashwinswaroop opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/810 This is the fix for the JIRA issue CLOUDSTACK-8817. This is my first contribution to Apache CloudStack. The return values for endpoint and startpoint have now been changed to Integer

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: This is the fix for the JIRA issue CLOUDS...

2015-09-11 Thread ashwinswaroop
Github user ashwinswaroop commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/810#issuecomment-139697149 Sorry for not changing the setter. I'm using eclipse now and I can see that there is a FirewallResponse.java file in both cloud and cloudstack-api. Should I

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: This is the fix for the JIRA issue CLOUDS...

2015-09-11 Thread ashwinswaroop
Github user ashwinswaroop commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/810#issuecomment-139703362 Okay that makes sense. I went through the entire project and found only one caller of setStartPort and setEndPort which was from the relevant class(Firewall

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: This is the fix for the JIRA issue CLOUDS...

2015-09-11 Thread rafaelweingartner
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/810#issuecomment-139698329 @ashwinswaroop, no problem. About the class duplicity, it just seems that there are two classes, but in reality there is only one. The question is