-Original Message-
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 10:16 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [MERGE] Merge VMSync improvement branch into master
Alex,
I completely understand. Please keep us in the loop on the progress.
If its
]
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 10:20 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [MERGE] Merge VMSync improvement branch into master
Ilya,
Thanks! The current problem on this branch is we're trying to distinguish
what's actually broken on master and what's broken by introducing this
change
it.
Thanks
ilya
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 9:16 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [MERGE] Merge VMSync improvement branch into master
Given the current state of BVT, I don't think we can reliably merge
-
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 10:16 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [MERGE] Merge VMSync improvement branch into master
Alex,
I completely understand. Please keep us in the loop on the progress. If its
functional to some extent
Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 4:34 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Merge VMSync improvement branch into master
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl
wrote:
I think Ilya offers is great
: [MERGE] Merge VMSync improvement branch into master
I agree with John that a change like this is very hard to test in an automated
fashion. Still i have been looking at the numbers for the code coverage with
cobertura. I was a bit disappointed to find that we have not made any progress
conscientiously push it in
under the current circumstances.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 7:11 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [MERGE] Merge VMSync improvement branch into master
Ideally I
VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java so you can review that file instead.
Thanks.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Kelven Yang [mailto:kelven.y...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 3:38 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Merge VMSync improvement branch into master
[mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 2:33 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Merge VMSync improvement branch into master
Hugo,
I completely agree with this stance, and will add a -1 as well. It has been a
significant challenge this cycle to complete
scenarios as possible on my end.
Thanks
ilya
-Original Message-
From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 2:33 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Merge VMSync improvement branch into master
Hugo,
I completely agree
] Merge VMSync improvement branch into master
Hugo,
I completely agree with this stance, and will add a -1 as well. It has
been a
significant challenge this cycle to complete high quality reviews due to the
large patch size and short time turnaround time. Going forward, I am going
@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Merge VMSync improvement branch into master
Hugo,
I completely agree with this stance, and will add a -1 as well. It
has been a significant challenge this cycle to complete high quality
reviews due to the large patch size and short time
:)
-Original Message-
From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 5:51 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Merge VMSync improvement branch into master
I think Ilya offers is great, my current stance is also to see how we
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote:
I think Ilya offers is great, my current stance is also to see how we can
bring this forward.
I've had the opportunity to meet with several people at the Citrix office in
Santa Clara, i'm actually working from their
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Merge VMSync improvement branch into master
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote:
I think Ilya offers is great, my current stance is also to see how we can
bring
this forward.
I've had
] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 4:27 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Merge VMSync improvement branch into master
Let's get it done :-)
I'm at about 15% of the entire commit, reading through it line by line...
My notes so far (this is just
. It is much appreciated.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 11:33 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Merge VMSync improvement branch into master
Hugo,
I completely agree with this stance, and will add
@David The types of concurrency changes introduced in this patch are
extremely difficult to completely test in an automated fashion.
Therefore, code review for correctness is critical to ensure quality.
To be clear, I am not questioning the value of automated testing. I
am just noting that it's
I agree with John that a change like this is very hard to test in an automated
fashion. Still i have been looking at the numbers for the code coverage with
cobertura. I was a bit disappointed to find that we have not made any progress
with this merge with regards to unit tests and total code
, June 18, 2013 3:38 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Merge VMSync improvement branch into master
On 6/17/13 7:43 PM, Mice Xia mice_...@tcloudcomputing.com wrote:
Kelven,
After the refactoring, will CS still restart HA enabled VM when it is
power off externally (e.g
[mailto:kelven.y...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 3:38 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Merge VMSync improvement branch into master
On 6/17/13 7:43 PM, Mice Xia mice_...@tcloudcomputing.com wrote:
Kelven,
After the refactoring, will CS still restart HA
() is not
called when VM's actual state is stopped while expected state is running.
Regards
Mice
-Original Message-
From: Kelven Yang [mailto:kelven.y...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 5:21 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Merge VMSync improvement branch
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 04:59:00PM +, Kelven Yang wrote:
I'd like to kick off the official merge process. We will start the merge
process after the branch has passed necessary tests
Kelven
Can you share what testing is being run against the branch?
I'd like to kick off the official merge process. We will start the merge
process after the branch has passed necessary tests
Kelven
On 6/10/13 2:51 PM, Kelven Yang kelven.y...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi there,
Alex Huang and I are targeting to finish the debugging process on VMsync
improvement by
Low level classes were tested in unit tests(MessageBus, Job framework, Job
dispatchers etc), interface layer changes are guarded through matching the
old semantics, but changes are tested manually, we are planning to get
this part of testing through BVT system after we have re-based the latest
Kelven,
Did this patch get pushed to Review Board? If so, what is the URL?
Thanks.
-John
On Jun 17, 2013, at 1:40 PM, Kelven Yang kelven.y...@citrix.com wrote:
Low level classes were tested in unit tests(MessageBus, Job framework, Job
dispatchers etc), interface layer changes are guarded
Haven't created a patch yet, will do it soon after some last wrap-ups.
Kelven
On 6/17/13 12:03 PM, John Burwell jburw...@basho.com wrote:
Kelven,
Did this patch get pushed to Review Board? If so, what is the URL?
Thanks.
-John
On Jun 17, 2013, at 1:40 PM, Kelven Yang kelven.y...@citrix.com
expected state is running.
Regards
Mice
-Original Message-
From: Kelven Yang [mailto:kelven.y...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 5:21 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Merge VMSync improvement branch into master
Haven't created a patch yet, will do it soon
28 matches
Mail list logo
