+1
Marco Sinhoreli
Consultant Manager
Phone: +55 21 2586 6390 | Fax: +55 21 2586 6002 | Mobile: +55 21 98276
3636
Praia de Botafogo 501, bloco 1 - sala 101, Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, RJ -
Brazil - CEP 22250-040
marco.sinhor...@shapeblue.com| www.shapeblue.com
On Mar 19, 2014, at 7:04 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:40:04AM -0400, Tim Mackey wrote:
Historically CloudStack has used Xen and XenServer interchangeably to refer
to any XenAPI based implementation. With the recent release of Xen Project
4.4
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:56 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO, and sadly, we should treat them as two different hypervisors: XP and
XS
Look like Docker and LXC :D
--Tuna
Historically CloudStack has used Xen and XenServer interchangeably to refer
to any XenAPI based implementation. With the recent release of Xen Project
4.4 (http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2014/03/10/xen-4-4-released/), and
interest in alternate architectures like ARM, the loose definition of our
@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Support pure Xen as a hypervisor
Historically CloudStack has used Xen and XenServer interchangeably to refer to
any XenAPI based implementation. With the recent release of Xen Project
4.4 (http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2014/03/10/xen-4-4
On Mar 18, 2014, at 4:40 PM, Tim Mackey tmac...@gmail.com wrote:
Historically CloudStack has used Xen and XenServer interchangeably to refer
to any XenAPI based implementation. With the recent release of Xen Project
4.4 (http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2014/03/10/xen-4-4-released/), and