Re: [PROPOSE] Dynamic inter VPC routing

-Luc Dion mailto:pd...@cloudops.com>> Date: Thursday, 28 January 2016 at 4:24 AM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Cc: Abhinandan Prateek mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com>> Subject: Re: [PROP

Re: [PROPOSE] Dynamic inter VPC routing

Hi Abhinandan, I'm actually looking at how to perform routing between VPC, but in our case we still need the public interface of the VPC as it is right now. Improvement such as BGP for various public route would be helpfull. But, when it come to internal traffic between VPCs, there is 2 way that

Re: [PROPOSE] Dynamic inter VPC routing

Thans Abhi, glad to hear :-) -- Erik On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Abhinandan Prateek < abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > Erik, > > Updated the doc to reflect that the CIDR partitioning is not rigid. > > > > > > [image: ShapeBlue] > Abhinandan Prateek > So

Re: [PROPOSE] Dynamic inter VPC routing

Erik, Updated the doc to reflect that the CIDR partitioning is not rigid. [ShapeBlue] Abhinandan Prateek Software Architect , ShapeBlue d: | s: +44 203 603 0540 | m: +91 970 11 99011 e: abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com | t: <

Re: [PROPOSE] Dynamic inter VPC routing

e. GSLB without DNS). Just my 2 cents. - Si From: Abhinandan Prateek Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2016 9:20 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] Dynamic inter VPC routing [ShapeBlue]<http://www.shapeblue.com> Abhinandan Prate

Re: [PROPOSE] Dynamic inter VPC routing

[ShapeBlue] Abhinandan Prateek Software Architect , ShapeBlue d: | s: +44 203 603 0540 | m: +91 970 11 99011 e: abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com | t: | w: www.s

Re: [PROPOSE] Dynamic inter VPC routing

On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Abhinandan Prateek < abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Currently the inter VPC traffic has to go thru the public gateway. > This means the traffic has to be nat-ed across public internet via > core-routers, which is inefficient in itself. A

Re: [PROPOSE] Dynamic inter VPC routing

Jayapal, Can you check if you can see the images ! Cheers ! On 05/01/16, 5:15 PM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" wrote: >Hi Abhi, > >Few images are not loading in the FS. Can you please correct it. > >Thanks, >Jayapal > >On 04-Jan-2016, at 7:40 pm, Abhinandan Prateek >mailto:abhinandan.prat...@s

Re: [PROPOSE] Dynamic inter VPC routing

Hi Abhi, Few images are not loading in the FS. Can you please correct it. Thanks, Jayapal On 04-Jan-2016, at 7:40 pm, Abhinandan Prateek mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com>> wrote: Hi All, Currently the inter VPC traffic has to go thru the public gateway. This means the traffic has

[PROPOSE] Dynamic inter VPC routing

Hi All, Currently the inter VPC traffic has to go thru the public gateway. This means the traffic has to be nat-ed across public internet via core-routers, which is inefficient in itself. A more efficient approach will be to route the traffic locally. The proposal is to enable quagga- os