would someone be able to fire up all those services (say for a basic zone)
on one host?
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Following the discussion [1], we have QuickCloud in a rough-but-ready
> state for developers to try out
> Instruction
Yes (actually that's what the instructions say)
On 3/26/13 10:46 PM, "Ahmad Emneina" wrote:
>would someone be able to fire up all those services (say for a basic zone)
>on one host?
>
>
>On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
>chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>> Following the
+1
so awesome!
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Chiradeep Vittal <
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Yes (actually that's what the instructions say)
>
> On 3/26/13 10:46 PM, "Ahmad Emneina" wrote:
>
> >would someone be able to fire up all those services (say for a basic zone)
> >on one hos
Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org"
Subject: Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
+1
so awesome!
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
Yes (actually that's what the instructions say)
On 3/26/13 10:46 PM, "Ahmad Emneina" wrote:
>woul
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
> Following the discussion [1], we have QuickCloud in a rough-but-ready state
> for developers to try out
> Instructions for developers to try it out with DevCloud2 here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/QuickCloud
s here
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/QuickCloud#QuickClou
> d-howto2
>
> From: Ahmad Emneina
> Reply-To: "aemne...@gmail.com"
> Date: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 10:34 AM
> To: Chiradeep Vittal
> Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org&qu
>
>Wow this is awesome. Will you consider writing a blog post about this?
Yes, sure.
One thing that is not 'ready' is the operational / packaging side of
things.
Copying systemvm.zip around and starting daemons without some kind of init
script isn't ideal.
Also the UI still shows "0" system vm
On 3/28/13 1:04 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" wrote:
>
>>
>>Wow this is awesome. Will you consider writing a blog post about this?
>
>Yes, sure.
>
>One thing that is not 'ready' is the operational / packaging side of
>things.
>Copying systemvm.zip around and starting daemons without some kind of init
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
>
>>
>>Wow this is awesome. Will you consider writing a blog post about this?
>
> Yes, sure.
>
> One thing that is not 'ready' is the operational / packaging side of
> things.
> Copying systemvm.zip around and starting daemons without some k
> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 1:34 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Phong Nguyen
> Subject: Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
>
>
>
> On 3/28
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Edison Su wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 1:34 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: Phong Nguyen
>> Subject: R
1:34 PM
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Cc: Phong Nguyen
> >> Subject: Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 3/28/13 1:04 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal"
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
>>
>so looking at this it all seems to be vitual box based, is that correct ??
>id be curious if it was possible to convert the vbox image to xen, and
>create
>say an Devcloud/XEN QuickCLoud since i see virtual box as overhead since
>im
>already running XEN under my desktop
>
Absolutely. You don
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>
> >>
> >so looking at this it all seems to be vitual box based, is that correct ??
> >id be curious if it was possible to convert the vbox image to xen, and
> >create
> >say an Devcloud/XEN QuickCLoud since
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Outback Dingo wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
> chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> >>
>> >so looking at this it all seems to be vitual box based, is that correct
>> ??
>> >id be curious if it was possible to convert th
@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>"
mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Cc: Phong Nguyen mailto:pngu...@gilt.com>>
Subject: Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Outback Dingo
mailto:outbackdi...@gmail.co
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Can you post your build error on paste.cloudstack.org ?
>
Here ya go! :) didnt know it existed
http://paste.cloudstack.org/kqi0/
Sorry about that. I switched to the quickcloud2 branch last Friday in
order to get a clean patch on master. Can you try that one out?
On 4/8/13 2:21 PM, "Outback Dingo" wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
>chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>> Can you post your build e
so clone quickcloud2 ???
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Sorry about that. I switched to the quickcloud2 branch last Friday in
> order to get a clean patch on master. Can you try that one out?
>
>
> On 4/8/13 2:21 PM, "Outback Dingo" wrot
you did see my previous email before the one about the error correct?
or am i hunting down the right path here, or heading off into complete
and vastly unkown territory not yet explored
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Sorry about that. I s
[INFO] Apache CloudStack DevCloud SUCCESS [0.655s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack DevCloud-KVM SUCCESS [0.295s]
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
---
quot;aemne...@gmail.com"
> Date: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 10:34 AM
> To: Chiradeep Vittal
> Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org"
> Subject: Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
>
>
> +1
> so awesome!
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:
22 matches
Mail list logo
