Re: BUG: anybody addressing this one ?

2015-03-19 Thread Andrija Panic
Ilya if possible, please share the script somewhere :) It would be usefull anyway, for cleaning detached volume that sits there for long time... Thanks! @Marcus, I was detaching volume and delete it afterwards Thanks On 18 March 2015 at 22:38, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Well, I

Re: BUG: anybody addressing this one ?

2015-03-18 Thread Andrei Mikhailovsky
...@gmail.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 18 March, 2015 11:58:53 AM Subject: BUG: anybody addressing this one ? Hi, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7926 Currently I have hit a bug, when I click on some instance, then on View Volumes, and then I get listed

BUG: anybody addressing this one ?

2015-03-18 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7926 Currently I have hit a bug, when I click on some instance, then on View Volumes, and then I get listed volumes that belong to some other VM - it already happened to me that I deleted the volumes - beacuse of ACS bug in GUI ! So, I

Re: BUG: anybody addressing this one ?

2015-03-18 Thread Andrija Panic
names before deleting to make sure I do the right one. This little bug is annoying to say the least ))) Andrei - Original Message - From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 18 March, 2015 11:58:53 AM Subject: BUG: anybody

Re: BUG: anybody addressing this one ?

2015-03-18 Thread Andrei Mikhailovsky
- From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 18 March, 2015 1:58:35 PM Subject: Re: BUG: anybody addressing this one ? Andrei, please comment the JIRA with same text if you have time :) otherwise...no use here I guess Thanks On 18

Re: BUG: anybody addressing this one ?

2015-03-18 Thread ilya
It looks like we have 2 issues here. 1) you are seeing volumes you should not see 2) volume purging is not implemented There are several solution to #2 1) I've written a shell script that deletes all volumes that are in detached state for over X number of days. I'll see if i can share the

Re: BUG: anybody addressing this one ?

2015-03-18 Thread Marcus
Well, I think many people will want to be able to leave disks detached without deleting them, I'm not sure what the use case was that caused Andrija to want to delete those disks. It sounds like he wanted to delete attached disks and keep the vm. From experience, it would be relatively trivial to