Re: CloudMonkey 5.0 (was Re: CloudMonkey's new home)

2013-08-27 Thread Rohit Yadav
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 01:06:37PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> ok, the down side will be that the semantics of the versioning are >> confusing when cloudstack 5 comes and the version numbers don't match. >> still a +1 from me though. > >

Re: CloudMonkey 5.0 (was Re: CloudMonkey's new home)

2013-08-26 Thread Chip Childers
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 01:06:37PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > ok, the down side will be that the semantics of the versioning are > confusing when cloudstack 5 comes and the version numbers don't match. > still a +1 from me though. I find it confusing as well, but am OK with a stable 5.x line be

Re: CloudMonkey 5.0 (was Re: CloudMonkey's new home)

2013-08-11 Thread Daan Hoogland
ok, the down side will be that the semantics of the versioning are confusing when cloudstack 5 comes and the version numbers don't match. still a +1 from me though. On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > >> +1 +question >>

Re: CloudMonkey 5.0 (was Re: CloudMonkey's new home)

2013-08-10 Thread Rohit Yadav
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > +1 +question > > Is cloudmonkey 5 backwards compatible in the sense that it can talk to a > 4.x ms? > Sorry for the confusion. Yes, in fact it is. It's the same cloudmonkey and is aimed to work with Apache CloudStack 4.0.0-incubating and it

Re: CloudMonkey 5.0 (was Re: CloudMonkey's new home)

2013-08-10 Thread Daan Hoogland
+1 +question Is cloudmonkey 5 backwards compatible in the sense that it can talk to a 4.x ms? On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 5:50 AM, David Nalley wrote: > +1 move forward. > > On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> Looks like the previous thread failed to capture attent

Re: CloudMonkey 5.0 (was Re: CloudMonkey's new home)

2013-08-09 Thread David Nalley
+1 move forward. On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi folks, > > Looks like the previous thread failed to capture attention on the dev ML. > I'm going forward with some decisions so as to move fast and as per our > philosophy to ask for forgiveness later than just waste time on

CloudMonkey 5.0 (was Re: CloudMonkey's new home)

2013-08-09 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hi folks, Looks like the previous thread failed to capture attention on the dev ML. I'm going forward with some decisions so as to move fast and as per our philosophy to ask for forgiveness later than just waste time on too much process polling now. Here are some proposals; - The version model w

CloudMonkey's new home

2013-07-28 Thread Rohit Yadav
Based on our previous discussion thread[1], we've moved CloudMonkey out of ACS's repository to its new home [2]. Now, with 6f84e74a68d78705a06fe58f7927f42f61453a16 on master, we no longer have cloudmonkey in tools/cli. CloudMonkey will be within CloudStack project but now as an independent sub-proj