blueorangutan commented on pull request #233:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/233#issuecomment-889760560
Doc build preview: http://qa.cloudstack.cloud/docs/WIP-PROOFING/pr/233.
(SL-JID 116)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To resp
davidjumani commented on pull request #233:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/233#issuecomment-889757747
@blueorangutan docbuild
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abov
davidjumani opened a new pull request #233:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/233
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscrib
davidjumani opened a new pull request #34:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/34
Updating Readme and examples prior to the release
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
ache.org ;
dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.0
Thanks for your support.
As an RM, I'll need access to the cloudstack / cloudstack-kubernetes-provider
dockerhub repo.
I'll also need my GPG key added to the KEYS file in the apache repo.
Thanks for your support.
As an RM, I'll need access to the cloudstack / cloudstack-kubernetes-provider
dockerhub repo.
I'll also need my GPG key added to the KEYS file in the apache repo. Could a
PMC help me out with that ?
pub rsa4096 2021-07-29 [SC] [expires:
onitake commented on issue #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/16#issuecomment-887791213
+1 to release.
I'll take a look at it @rhtyd .
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
rhtyd commented on issue #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/16#issuecomment-887231506
@davidjumani I've created/pushed latest build to
https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tags?page=1&ordering=last_updated
Wh
rhtyd commented on issue #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/16#issuecomment-887228952
+1, if @onitake and @joschi36 don't respond, I would say let's do some basic
smoke-testing to ensure it is working and cut RC.
--
This is an automat
davidjumani commented on issue #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/16#issuecomment-887220783
Ping @rhtyd @onitake @joschi36 shall I take it as an overwhelmingly yes ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
davidjumani commented on issue #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/16#issuecomment-882205915
@onitake @joschi36 @rhtyd Since there are no more issues / PRs for v1.0,
Shall we cut a release ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
+1
Good luck David!
Regards,
Suresh
On 15/07/21, 12:02 PM, "David Jumani" wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to put myself forward as the release manager for CloudStack
Kubernetes Provider<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider>
v1.0.
This will be
+1
From: David Jumani
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 1:31 AM
To: users ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [PROPOSE] RM for CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.0
Hi,
I'd like to put myself forward as the release manager for CloudStack Kubernetes
Pro
Hi,
I'd like to put myself forward as the release manager for CloudStack Kubernetes
Provider<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider> v1.0.
This will be the first release of CloudStack Kubernetes Provider which
facilitates Kubernetes deployments on Cloudstack
rhtyd commented on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/32#issuecomment-872179535
Okay removing from 1.0 milestone
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
joschi36 commented on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/32#issuecomment-870644101
@rhtyd @davidjumani I also vote to move this out of v1.0, so we finally can
get the first release done. Never intended to be in 1.0
--
This is an
davidjumani commented on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/32#issuecomment-865517226
@rhtyd @joschi36 Can this be merged after 1.0 is released? Since there only
exist isos for 1.16. Post release isos for 1.18, 1.20 can be created and
davidjumani commented on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/32#issuecomment-865517226
@rhtyd @joschi36 Can this be merged after 1.0 is released? Since there only
exist isos for 1.16. Post release isos for 1.18, 1.20 can be created and
rhtyd merged pull request #33:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/33
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about
sureshanaparti opened a new pull request #33:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/33
Inclusivity changes - change default git branch to 'main'.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
rhtyd commented on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/32#issuecomment-864006988
Any update on this - can this be merged?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
rhtyd commented on issue #15:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/15#issuecomment-847878913
Closing this, @iamcryptoki pl follow #7 and #16 and wait for v1.0 something
soon (in coming weeks/months).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
rhtyd closed issue #15:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/15
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this
rhtyd closed issue #12:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/12
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this
rhtyd commented on issue #12:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/12#issuecomment-847878366
Closing this.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
rhtyd commented on issue #7:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/7#issuecomment-847878250
Closing this dockerhub and travis are available.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
rhtyd closed issue #7:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/7
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this
rhtyd merged pull request #29:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/29
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about
joschi36 commented on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/32#issuecomment-845096111
> @joschi36 Could you provide the iso you used to deploy a 1.20 env ?
@davidjumani Hey I'm not sure what you are referring to, but m
rhtyd merged pull request #31:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/31
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about
davidjumani commented on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/32#issuecomment-845035765
@joschi36 Could you provide the iso you used to deploy a 1.20 env ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
joschi36 commented on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/32#issuecomment-845033580
@onitake @davidjumani Can you review this PR?
I already tested the software in K8s 1.20 and it seems working.
--
This is an automated message from the
onitake commented on a change in pull request #29:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/29#discussion_r635278142
##
File path: Makefile
##
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ GIT_COMMIT_SHORT=$(shell git rev-parse --short HEAD)
GIT_TAG=$(shell git describe
onitake commented on a change in pull request #29:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/29#discussion_r635275404
##
File path: cloudstack_loadbalancer.go
##
@@ -121,8 +121,8 @@ func (cs *CSCloud) EnsureLoadBalancer(ctx context.Context
schlapzz opened a new pull request #32:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/32
Kubernetes Version to 1.20.6 and Golang Version to 1.15
Docker image for testing:
docker.io/swisstxt/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.20.6-ae73327f
--
This is an
joschi36 commented on issue #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/16#issuecomment-843172857
@rhtyd I have tested the release, and it seems working.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
joschi36 commented on issue #14:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/14#issuecomment-843170555
There is now CSI driver for CloudStack. Do you think we can close this
issue? https://github.com/apalia/cloudstack-csi-driver
--
This is an automated message
onitake commented on issue #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/16#issuecomment-843063679
@rhtyd Your script pushes the source tarballs to a Subversion repository -
is that standard practice in the Apache foundation?
I'd thought that nobody
onitake opened a new pull request #31:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/31
The Docker Hub badge won't work when the images are built elsewhere.
I replaced it with a version badge and also improved the other badges a bit.
The release badge
onitake commented on issue #15:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/15#issuecomment-843028565
Release management and CI is being addressed in #7 and #16 .
We have access to Dockerhub now, and containers will be pushed there.
Please stay tuned for
onitake commented on issue #12:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/12#issuecomment-843023927
This is being address in #7 .
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
onitake closed issue #5:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/5
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this
onitake commented on issue #5:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/5#issuecomment-843022973
This was already fixed by https://github.com/kubernetes/website/pull/16129 -
we can close this issue now.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
davidjumani commented on issue #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/16#issuecomment-839507920
+1 for co-RM and maintaining with @onitake and @joschi36
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
rhtyd commented on issue #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/16#issuecomment-838383420
As the next steps, I've created a script that will help perform source
releases (copied from other ACS repos):
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kuber
DaanHoogland commented on a change in pull request #29:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/29#discussion_r629899906
##
File path: Makefile
##
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ GIT_COMMIT_SHORT=$(shell git rev-parse --short HEAD)
GIT_TAG=$(shell git describe
rhtyd commented on issue #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/16#issuecomment-836980447
@onitake @joschi36 since this project is under ASF now, a committer or PMC
member has right to publish source tarball and to dockerhub. I'll work with you
bo
joschi36 commented on issue #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/16#issuecomment-836442553
What's the status here now?
Can we create the release now?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, p
davidjumani commented on a change in pull request #29:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/29#discussion_r629156668
##
File path: cloudstack_loadbalancer.go
##
@@ -121,8 +121,8 @@ func (cs *CSCloud) EnsureLoadBalancer(ctx context.Context
rhtyd commented on a change in pull request #29:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/29#discussion_r625988965
##
File path: cloudstack_loadbalancer.go
##
@@ -121,8 +121,8 @@ func (cs *CSCloud) EnsureLoadBalancer(ctx context.Context,
clusterName
rhtyd closed issue #28:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/28
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this
rhtyd merged pull request #30:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/30
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about
onitake commented on pull request #30:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/30#issuecomment-831301385
@joschi36 I think this issue is not tied to the minor version bump, but was
introduced with k8s 1.17.
I know that you are busy, but could you test the
joschi36 edited a comment on pull request #30:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/30#issuecomment-831244086
@davidjumani When running in my setup I had to change RBAC rules.
Got this error:
```I0503 12:44:20.142166 1 leaderelection.go
joschi36 edited a comment on pull request #30:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/30#issuecomment-831244086
@davidjumani When running in my setup I had to change RBAC rules.
Got this error:
```I0503 12:44:20.142166 1 leaderelection.go
joschi36 commented on pull request #30:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/30#issuecomment-831244086
@davidjumani When running in my setup I had to change RBAC rules.
Got this error:
```I0503 12:44:20.142166 1 leaderelection.go:247
rhtyd commented on pull request #30:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/30#issuecomment-831148853
Thanks @onitake, we'll wait to hear from @joschi36 on tests
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, p
onitake commented on pull request #30:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/30#issuecomment-831148076
Thanks, @davidjumani .
LGTM from a formal point of view, but please wait for test results from
@joschi36 .
--
This is an automated message from the
davidjumani commented on pull request #30:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/30#issuecomment-829803339
@joschi36 I've rebuilt it, can you pull it again and try ?
@onitake Reverted the change and will open a separate PR
--
This is an automated me
onitake commented on a change in pull request #30:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/30#discussion_r623466535
##
File path: .travis.yml
##
@@ -4,4 +4,7 @@ go:
- 1.13
- master
-script: make test
+services:
+ - docker
+
+script: make docker
sureshanaparti commented on a change in pull request #29:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/29#discussion_r623089878
##
File path: README.md
##
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ The CCM supports the same cloud-config configuration file
format used by [the
joschi36 commented on pull request #30:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/30#issuecomment-829227139
Hey @davidjumani
> Can use the image over at
davidjumani/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:k-v1.18.18
Is it possible that it's not build
onitake commented on issue #2:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/2#issuecomment-829153469
I'm not sure how we can address this...
Maybe we should just put a comment in the readme for now.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Se
onitake commented on a change in pull request #30:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/30#discussion_r622960584
##
File path: Dockerfile
##
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
FROM golang:1.13 as builder
COPY . /go/src/github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes
onitake commented on a change in pull request #30:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/30#discussion_r622960377
##
File path: Makefile
##
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ CMD_SRC=\
.PHONY: all clean docker
-all: cloudstack-ccm
+all: clean test cloudstack
davidjumani commented on pull request #30:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/30#issuecomment-828988987
@rhtyd Added docker builds to travis. Unit tests are needed which is tracked
in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/23
davidjumani commented on a change in pull request #29:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/29#discussion_r622768403
##
File path: .travis.yml
##
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@ language: go
go:
- 1.13
-- master
+- main
Review comment:
Requires
rhtyd merged pull request #27:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/27
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about
davidjumani commented on pull request #30:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/30#issuecomment-828166025
@onitake @joschi36 Can you review ?
Can use the image over at
`davidjumani/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:k-v1.18.18`
Thanks
--
This is an
davidjumani opened a new pull request #30:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/30
Fixes https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/28
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
davidjumani commented on a change in pull request #29:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/29#discussion_r621824001
##
File path: Makefile
##
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ GIT_COMMIT_SHORT=$(shell git rev-parse --short HEAD)
GIT_TAG=$(shell git describe
davidjumani commented on a change in pull request #29:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/29#discussion_r621822210
##
File path: README.md
##
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ The CCM supports the same cloud-config configuration file
format used by [the cs
davidjumani commented on pull request #27:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/27#issuecomment-828134518
@rhtyd Can you merge ?
Thanks
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
davidjumani commented on pull request #27:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/27#issuecomment-828134379
Right, unrelated
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
onitake commented on pull request #27:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/27#issuecomment-827637589
3+ replicas of the cloud provider seems like total overkill.
It doesn't store any state, and it doesn't need to be highly available. It
will s
davidjumani edited a comment on pull request #27:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/27#issuecomment-827556759
@onitake Agreed so not necessarily a deamonset, but in the case of a smaller
env, there will be 3 pods on maybe 1 or 2 nodes, since most users
davidjumani edited a comment on pull request #27:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/27#issuecomment-827556759
@onitake Agreed so not necessarily a deamonset, but in the case of a smaller
env, there will be 3 pods on maybe 1 or 2 nodes. I'd prefer to
davidjumani commented on pull request #27:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/27#issuecomment-827556759
@onitake Agreed, but in the case of a smaller env, there will be 3 pods on
maybe 1 or 2 nodes. I'd prefer to have the replicas proportional to the
onitake commented on pull request #27:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/27#issuecomment-826630266
Not really. The original CCM needed to have an instance on each node, to
interact with the host system.
This is no longer the case with the cloud
sureshanaparti opened a new pull request #29:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/29
Inclusivity changes for CloudStack - rename some offensive words/terms as
appropriate, that are meaningful and inclusive.
- Renamed default git branch name from
rhtyd commented on issue #28:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/28#issuecomment-826572036
cc @onitake @joschi36 @davidjumani
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
davidjumani commented on pull request #27:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/27#issuecomment-826537469
@onitake wouldn't it be better if it was run as a daemonset ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the me
davidjumani commented on pull request #27:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/27#issuecomment-826537469
@onitake wouldn't it be better if it was run as a daemonset ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the me
QiAnXinCodeSafe opened a new issue #28:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/28
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/blob/25cb3ecdf8e3555bb34c5454f3965aa8b3a7de7c/go.mod#L14
CVE-2020-8558 CVE-2020-8557 CVE-2020-8565 CVE-2020
onitake commented on issue #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/16#issuecomment-825485505
Oh, I just noticed something incorrect in the readme:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/blame/master/README.md#L23
"DeamonSe
onitake opened a new pull request #27:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/27
I mistakenly wrote in the readme that the provider should be DaemonSet.
This is wrong and should be removed.
The example deployment.yaml is correct.
--
This is an
onitake edited a comment on issue #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/16#issuecomment-825478426
+1 for releasing 1.0.0.
One nitpick: Maybe change
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/blob/master/deployment.yaml#L146
to
onitake edited a comment on issue #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/16#issuecomment-825478426
+1 for releasing 1.0.0.
One nitpick: Maybe change
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/blob/master/deployment.yaml#L146
to
onitake commented on issue #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/16#issuecomment-825478426
I'm also for releasing 1.0.0.
One nitpick: Maybe change
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/blob/master/deployment.yaml#L14
davidjumani commented on issue #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/16#issuecomment-824762383
+1
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
joschi36 commented on issue #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/16#issuecomment-824703342
I think we can release 1.0.0 now.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
rhtyd commented on issue #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/16#issuecomment-824700524
@joschi36 @onitake @davidjumani - I see all PRs merged now, do we have
anything outstanding for 1.0 release?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
rhtyd merged pull request #25:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/25
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about
rhtyd merged pull request #26:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/26
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about
joschi36 commented on pull request #26:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/26#issuecomment-824665624
@davidjumani I don't have any permissions on this repository. @rhtyd would
need to merge
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servic
davidjumani commented on pull request #26:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/26#issuecomment-824663163
@joschi36 Could you review and merge ? Thanks
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
davidjumani opened a new pull request #26:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/26
Updates the readme to use `cloud-config` as the filename while creating the
secret to match the deployment
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
joschi36 commented on pull request #25:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/25#issuecomment-824628638
> @joschi36 Tested and works. Also distorless comes with ca certs so they
can be removed from the dockerfile
@davidjumani I have just removed the
rhtyd commented on pull request #25:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/25#issuecomment-824622039
@davidjumani @joschi36 is this good to merge now?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
davidjumani commented on pull request #25:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/25#issuecomment-824608536
@joschi36 Tested and works. Also distorless comes with ca certs so they can
be removed from the dockerfile
--
This is an automated message from the
201 - 300 of 489 matches
Mail list logo
