Thanks for the links, Chip.
Yeah...I need to become more familiar with our workflow.
I plan to polish off what I've been working on in the next day or two.
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 01:14:08PM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> > Hi Chip,
> >
>
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 01:14:08PM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Hi Chip,
>
> Yes, the intent is to provide the code for release in 4.2. Not just the
> plug-in, but also the improvements to the storage framework (which should
> benefit any company wanting to implement dynamic, zone-wide storage).
Hi Chip,
Yes, the intent is to provide the code for release in 4.2. Not just the
plug-in, but also the improvements to the storage framework (which should
benefit any company wanting to implement dynamic, zone-wide storage).
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Mon, May 20
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 01:09:21PM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Thanks for that info!
>
> When I started with my development work, it was mainly focused on
> implementing a storage plug-in to be based on Edison's new storage
> framework.
>
> Definitely let me know, but I was t
Hi everyone,
Thanks for that info!
When I started with my development work, it was mainly focused on
implementing a storage plug-in to be based on Edison's new storage
framework.
Definitely let me know, but I was thinking such a plug-in wasn't something
the list would be as interested in partici
On 05/20/2013 08:58 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
Just throwing this out there, but maybe in the schema-410to420.sql file?
Yes, that's where it should go. If this hits 4.2 I mean.
I'm not sure what our upgrade paths are, though, so maybe this file needs
to get changed and others?
The code wi
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:58:46PM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Just throwing this out there, but maybe in the schema-410to420.sql file?
If you are planning on being feature complete by the feature freeze
window, then that's the one!
>
> I'm not sure what our upgrade paths are, though, so mayb
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:55:27PM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been writing code to enable users to select min, max, and burst IOPS
> for Disk Offerings.
>
> I've gotten to the point where I need to create these new fields in the DB,
> but I'm not sure where we control this logic.
Just throwing this out there, but maybe in the schema-410to420.sql file?
I'm not sure what our upgrade paths are, though, so maybe this file needs
to get changed and others?
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been writing code
Hi,
I've been writing code to enable users to select min, max, and burst IOPS
for Disk Offerings.
I've gotten to the point where I need to create these new fields in the DB,
but I'm not sure where we control this logic. My new code would look
something like this:
alter table disk_offering add co
10 matches
Mail list logo
