Please propose a new network documentation page as part of this discussion.
If it makes it more palatable to developers, we could rename the
documentation to "Use Cases".
That would make it easier to discuss the real impact on users of what is
being proposed.
The current network document
Sorry for being late to the party.
'in theory' couldn't we do away with the idea that 'advanced networking with
security groups' is a type of zone and just allow the use of security groups in
any network, instead of making people 'choose' up front.
I believe AWS allows the use of security groups
>
> From: Wido den Hollander
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 8:26:40 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Blocking the creation of new Basic Networking zones
>
> For now I've created a Pull Request so we can have
ckages yet.
[1] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/eol-135779.html
- Rohit
<https://cloudstack.apache.org>
From: Wido den Hollander
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 8:26:40 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Blocking the
For now I've created a Pull Request so we can have a discussion about it
there: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2720
Wido
On 06/21/2018 02:34 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher wrote:
> +1
>
> We have an empty page regarding 5.0 [1] in the Design documents section
> [2]. It might be a good spo
+1
We have an empty page regarding 5.0 [1] in the Design documents section
[2]. It might be a good spot to sort out CloudStack 5.0 plans.
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/5.0+Design+Documents
[2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Design
2018-06-21 5
well, that one is a good one to update, but there was a dedicated 5.0 page
at some time. I think we can just use this from here on in and merge
anything else in it when we find it ;)
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This one [1]?
>
> [1]
This one [1]?
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Roadmap
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> Wido, there used to be a page on cwiki with plans for 5.0, I can not find
> it anymore but this should be added to it.
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 6:42 PM, i
Wido, there used to be a page on cwiki with plans for 5.0, I can not find
it anymore but this should be added to it.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 6:42 PM, ilya musayev
wrote:
> I think the simplicity of Basic Zone was - you can get away with 1 VLAN
> for everything (great for POC setup) where as Adva
On 06/20/2018 08:42 PM, ilya musayev wrote:
> I think the simplicity of Basic Zone was - you can get away with 1 VLAN
> for everything (great for POC setup) where as Advanced Shared with VLAN
> isolation requires several VLANs to get going.
>
Does it? I have Advanced Networking running with ju
I think the simplicity of Basic Zone was - you can get away with 1 VLAN for
everything (great for POC setup) where as Advanced Shared with VLAN
isolation requires several VLANs to get going.
How would we cover this use case?
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:34 AM Tutkowski, Mike
wrote:
> Also, yes, I
Also, yes, I agree with the list you provided, Wido. We might have to break
“other fancy stuff” into more detail, though. ;)
On 6/20/18, 12:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote:
Sorry, Wido :) I missed that part.
On 6/20/18, 5:03 AM, "Wido den Hollander" wrote:
Sorry, Wido :) I missed that part.
On 6/20/18, 5:03 AM, "Wido den Hollander" wrote:
On 06/20/2018 12:31 AM, Tutkowski, Mike wrote:
> If this initiative goes through, perhaps that’s a good time to bump
CloudStack’s release number to 5.0.0?
>
That's what I said in
I never meant for this thread to de-rail into what should be CloudStack
5.0 :-)
I haven't heard any objections against the creation of new Basic
Networking Zones being prohibited, but hey, it's been <24 hours since I
send the first mail.
Wido
On 06/20/2018 04:51 PM, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> Hi!
>
- When roles do not have access to some API methods, the buttons/links that
use these API methods should disappear from the interface.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Stephan Seitz
wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> > > With that we would:
> > >
> > > - Drop creation of new Basic Networking Zones
> > > - Suppo
Hi!
> > With that we would:
> >
> > - Drop creation of new Basic Networking Zones
> > - Support IPv6 in shared IPv6 networks
> > - Java 9?
> > - Drop support for Ubuntu 12.04
> > - Other fancy stuff?
> - Versioned API: keep v1 API (< v5.0.0) and create a v2 API >= v5.0.0
> where we fix all inco
+1
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 4:35 PM, Rene Moser wrote:
>
>
> On 06/20/2018 01:03 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 06/20/2018 12:31 AM, Tutkowski, Mike wrote:
> >> If this initiative goes through, perhaps that’s a good time to bump
> CloudStack’s release number to 5.0.0?
> >>
> >
> > T
On 06/20/2018 01:03 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 06/20/2018 12:31 AM, Tutkowski, Mike wrote:
>> If this initiative goes through, perhaps that’s a good time to bump
>> CloudStack’s release number to 5.0.0?
>>
>
> That's what I said in my e-mail :-) But yes, I agree with you, this
>
On 06/20/2018 12:31 AM, Tutkowski, Mike wrote:
> If this initiative goes through, perhaps that’s a good time to bump
> CloudStack’s release number to 5.0.0?
>
That's what I said in my e-mail :-) But yes, I agree with you, this
might be a good time to bump it to 5.0
With that we would:
- Dro
+1
I would love to. But I'm a real novice when it comes to the UI though.
So that would be something I wouldn't be good at doing.
We all can help you with the UI. It is a little complicated at the
beginning because it is a JavaScript that generates HTML code. However, it
is doable.
On Wed, Jun
If this initiative goes through, perhaps that’s a good time to bump
CloudStack’s release number to 5.0.0?
> On Jun 19, 2018, at 3:17 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 06/19/2018 11:07 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>> I like this initiative, and here comes the big but even though I myself
>
On 06/19/2018 11:07 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> I like this initiative, and here comes the big but even though I myself
> might think it is not valid; Basic zones are there to give a simple start
> for new users. If we can give a one-knob start/one page wizard for creating
> a shared network in a
I like this initiative, and here comes the big but even though I myself
might think it is not valid; Basic zones are there to give a simple start
for new users. If we can give a one-knob start/one page wizard for creating
a shared network in advanced zone with security groups and userdata, great.
A
23 matches
Mail list logo
