-
From: Wilder Rodrigues [mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 10:30 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Remi Bergsma <rberg...@schubergphilis.com>
Subject: Re: BVT report - 10/22
Hi Raja,
Test is done and we have failures:
Test for port forw
I presume simulator runs are still 100% ?
On Oct 22, 2015, at 4:01 PM, Raja Pullela wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following is the latest BVT report - 10/22
> Xen Basic : 94.0%
> KVM Basic: 97.1% - glad to see the reboot ssvm/cpvm are fixed
> Xen Adv: 91.9% - test_internal_lb and
Hi Raja,
Internal LB has been working since PR 940 was merged and the test itself has
also been improved to do proper testing. We have tested that for KVM. What do
you mean by "// Issue to be investigated”?
Concerning the SSVM/CPVM, yep… working fine again: I created the PR 959 (with
extra
Hi wilder,
Internal Lb tests, I need to investigate the failures, some race condition when
I ran it.
Best
Raja
> On Oct 22, 2015, at 9:40 PM, Wilder Rodrigues
> wrote:
>
> Hi Raja,
>
> Internal LB has been working since wilder PR 940 was merged and the test
Okay.
We haven’t got any failure, but I’m curious about what you have to share.
I started the test_network here and it’s going fine. However, we need to
improve that one. It has a test that delete the PF rules and tries to SSH into
the VM - failure is expected. But unfortunately it has a
I didn't run them this time.
> On Oct 22, 2015, at 7:45 PM, sebgoa wrote:
>
> I presume simulator runs are still 100% ?
>
>> On Oct 22, 2015, at 4:01 PM, Raja Pullela wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Following is the latest BVT report - 10/22
>> Xen Basic :
Hi Raja,
Test is done and we have failures:
Test for port forwarding on source NAT ... === TestName:
test_01_port_fwd_on_src_nat | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test for port forwarding on non source NAT ... === TestName:
test_02_port_fwd_on_non_src_nat | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test for reboot