RE: BVT report - 10/22

2015-10-26 Thread Raja Pullela
- From: Wilder Rodrigues [mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 10:30 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Remi Bergsma <rberg...@schubergphilis.com> Subject: Re: BVT report - 10/22 Hi Raja, Test is done and we have failures: Test for port forw

Re: BVT report - 10/22

2015-10-22 Thread sebgoa
I presume simulator runs are still 100% ? On Oct 22, 2015, at 4:01 PM, Raja Pullela wrote: > Hi, > > Following is the latest BVT report - 10/22 > Xen Basic : 94.0% > KVM Basic: 97.1% - glad to see the reboot ssvm/cpvm are fixed > Xen Adv: 91.9% - test_internal_lb and

Re: BVT report - 10/22

2015-10-22 Thread Wilder Rodrigues
Hi Raja, Internal LB has been working since PR 940 was merged and the test itself has also been improved to do proper testing. We have tested that for KVM. What do you mean by "// Issue to be investigated”? Concerning the SSVM/CPVM, yep… working fine again: I created the PR 959 (with extra

Re: BVT report - 10/22

2015-10-22 Thread Raja Pullela
Hi wilder, Internal Lb tests, I need to investigate the failures, some race condition when I ran it. Best Raja > On Oct 22, 2015, at 9:40 PM, Wilder Rodrigues > wrote: > > Hi Raja, > > Internal LB has been working since wilder PR 940 was merged and the test

Re: BVT report - 10/22

2015-10-22 Thread Wilder Rodrigues
Okay. We haven’t got any failure, but I’m curious about what you have to share. I started the test_network here and it’s going fine. However, we need to improve that one. It has a test that delete the PF rules and tries to SSH into the VM - failure is expected. But unfortunately it has a

Re: BVT report - 10/22

2015-10-22 Thread Raja Pullela
I didn't run them this time. > On Oct 22, 2015, at 7:45 PM, sebgoa wrote: > > I presume simulator runs are still 100% ? > >> On Oct 22, 2015, at 4:01 PM, Raja Pullela wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Following is the latest BVT report - 10/22 >> Xen Basic :

Re: BVT report - 10/22

2015-10-22 Thread Wilder Rodrigues
Hi Raja, Test is done and we have failures: Test for port forwarding on source NAT ... === TestName: test_01_port_fwd_on_src_nat | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test for port forwarding on non source NAT ... === TestName: test_02_port_fwd_on_non_src_nat | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test for reboot