And that is what it should be ;) So untill then the qualification is being
able to test PRs in abundance.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Remi Bergsma
wrote:
> I don't think we need more RMs per se. I'd rather have more people testing
> and reviewing the PRs. That will bring more velocity, not
I don't think we need more RMs per se. I'd rather have more people testing and
reviewing the PRs. That will bring more velocity, not more RMs.
Being RM now is a hell of a job because only a few people do reviews and tests
and I was crazy enough to compensate for that by testing many of them mys
ntact the sender if you
believe you have received this email in error.
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 December 2015 09:40
To: dev
Subject: RM wanted
H all,
For 4.8 we need RMs. I will not continue with this job and if Remi does, h
H all,
For 4.8 we need RMs. I will not continue with this job and if Remi does, he
shouldn't be on his own!
Any committer that feels like it is needed and they are capable, please
come forward. Of course, if you feel we can do without, please elaborate on
your views. I think this job can be share
