Thanks Daan.
-Prachi
> On May 17, 2014, at 2:25 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
>
> Sorry Prachi, I didn't read though the whole of the message, it being
> longer then the code change. It is pulled.
>
>> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Daan Hoogland
>> wrote:
>> Prachi,
>>
>> It seems to me th
Sorry Prachi, I didn't read though the whole of the message, it being
longer then the code change. It is pulled.
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Prachi,
>
> It seems to me that this is only a refactor/rename of a function. What
> has functionally changed/am I missing?
>
>
Prachi,
It seems to me that this is only a refactor/rename of a function. What
has functionally changed/am I missing?
regards,
Daan (all for the refactor but it doesn't pertain to the comment of the commit)
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 2:21 AM, Prachi Damle wrote:
> Hi Daan,
>
>
>
> Can you please c
