To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com, John Kinsella
j...@stratosec.co, int-cloud
int-cl...@schubergphilis.com
Sent: Thursday, 19 February, 2015 17:11:26
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Redundant VPC routers and persistent router config
Ian,
Thanks for the clarification
Hi All,
We have had a discussion about this development in-house and have decided to
slow things down just a little. We just want a few days to get our own
integration test coverage better. We hope that way to be able to merge code
with a much fewer faults.
We do not however have the
-
From: Ian Southam isout...@schubergphilis.com
To: Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
Cc: dev dev@cloudstack.apache.org, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co,
int-cloud int-cl...@schubergphilis.com
Sent: Thursday, 19 February, 2015 16:39:22
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Redundant VPC routers
: Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com, John Kinsella
j...@stratosec.co, int-cloud
int-cl...@schubergphilis.com
Sent: Thursday, 19 February, 2015 17:11:26
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Redundant VPC routers and persistent router config
Ian,
Thanks for the clarification and effort.
I'm trying
Good point Marcus. I'll look into that.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I just want to make sure that it doesn't require/assume
persistency when some people rely on recreate.systemvm.enabled=true to
provide clean/fresh systemvms with every reboot,
Can someone expand on what's meant by 'systemvm persistent config'?
Somehow this makes me think that the systemvms would no longer be
easily rebuildable.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:11 AM, Wilder Rodrigues
wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
Hi there,
I’m building a devcloud-kvm in order to
I've browsed the code, and I don't really see anything
hypervisor-specific for KVM aside from a change to
VirtualRoutingResource to handle the new AbstractConfigItemFacade,
which looks like it's used to pass commands to the virtual router.
Assuming the VR can be configured, there aren't any
Wido, those were my thoughts as well. I haven't looked at the code
yet, but I'd be surprised if they had to change storage code (or even
hypervisor-specific code outside of passing along new VR script
Commands) in any way to accommodate a VR feature, so I hope this is
just caution. But enough
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/17/2015 02:19 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
People,
We are having some internal discussions about this code at
Schuberg Philis. We are (most specifically I am) convinced that we
cannot foresee the ways in which this can break master when
But a recreate will still work, right? If you delete the router or set
recreate.systemvm.enabled=true it will still result in a working
router?
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
It means that cloudstack doesn't have to reconfigure them on reboot as
Hi Marcus,
Your review is awesomely welcome, Marcus - if such word exist. :)
Since this whole works was carried out along a few months, it was difficult to
split formatting, refactoring and functionality. But as you have noticed,
besides the Façade/Flyweight pattern applied to the ways command
Yes, the delete works. Dont know if we included the option recreate in
our tests. Should not be a biggy though. It is not relevant for the
persistency.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
But a recreate will still work, right? If you delete the router or set
Hi all,
I have been some tests on the branch in order to give you all some confidence.
During the tests I found 1 bug related to communication from VM A on Tier 1 to
VM B on Tier 2 in a Single VPC. I can reproduce the bug and it disappears when
I convert the Single VPC to a redundant one. I
H Karl, Did you have a look at the work going on @ Schuberg Philis
yet? It seems to me there is double work going on that is not
compatible to one another. our work is now at the branch
feature/systemvm-persistent-config-3 ('-3' because of the painful
rebase work we are having to do)
As things
Daan,
Good to hear from you! Hope all is well.
Yes, we should talk, but I'm afraid my schedule is such that I cannot put a
meeting on the calendar until the new year.
We have looked at the Java refactoring work. I seems most of that work was
a true refactoring in that it didn't change the
15 matches
Mail list logo
