https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/%5BPROPOSAL%5D+2016-2017+Release+Cycle+and+Calendar
is an interesting page that needs to be updated or removed.
Has the proposal been accepted?
Are all of the dates realistic now?
What dates were met?
Could it be expanded to include the
ect fixes present
> in 4.9 and 4.8.1 would require more than 2 weeks of work to backport to a
> 4.8-based LTS. Therefore, I have shifted the LTS cutoff dates from 1 Jan and
> 1 July to 15 Jan and 15 July.
>
> Once we gain consensus on the release cycle and calendar, I will cle
Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
From: John Burwell
Sent: 06 July 2016 00:46:09
To: Wido den Hollander
Cc: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] 2016-2017 Release Cycle and Calendar
Wido,
I don’t think that Rohit is advocating expanding the 4.9.0 scope. Instead
t 4.9.0 out of the door and have LTS based on 4.9.0 release.
> >>
> >>
> >> If Will is not able to find time to work on 4.9 release, maybe someone
> >> else can takeover and help with the 4.9 release by 15th July (at least get
> >> some RCs up for te
d be
>>> released by 1 July. I have adjusted the timelines assuming that we will
>>> complete the release by 15 July. My thinking is that the number of defect
>>> fixes present in 4.9 and 4.8.1 would require more than 2 weeks of work to
>>> backport to a 4.8-
ast get some
> RCs up for testing and voting)? LTS can be 4.9.1 etc.
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
> From: Wido den Hollander
> Sent: 04 July 2016 15:32:45
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; John Burwell
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] 20
release by 15th July (at least get some RCs up
for testing and voting)? LTS can be 4.9.1 etc.
Regards.
From: Wido den Hollander
Sent: 04 July 2016 15:32:45
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; John Burwell
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] 2016-2017 Release Cycle and Calenda
efore, I have shifted the LTS cutoff dates from 1 Jan and
> 1 July to 15 Jan and 15 July.
>
> Once we gain consensus on the release cycle and calendar, I will cleanup the
> wiki to move completed release plans to an archive area and remove obsolete
> release process documentation.
&
consensus on the release cycle and calendar, I will cleanup the
wiki to move completed release plans to an archive area and remove obsolete
release process documentation.
Thanks,
-John
[1]: http://markmail.org/thread/zzrjldiryhy3ygfk
[2]: http://markmail.org/thread/7rv3jwz4hzf3yplf
[3]: http
