---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11088/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers.
Description
---
There are
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11088/#review20489
---
Ship it!
In 4.1:
commit 5ccdf7dc4ad86145633124b9540aadfbfc423f6f
A
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11088/#review20984
---
Commit 3e02a76f001b14ad25e5fdc55efc137457e5e52b in branch refs/heads
Would this not be a problem for folks who are already on 4.0 ?
On 13/05/13 9:22 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
>---
>This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>https://reviews.apache.org/r/11088/#review20489
>---
It would indeed, but since we are not going to release a 4.0.3, I fixed
it in the 4.1 and master branches.
At a minimum, this "fix" doesn't regress anything... so while I'm
surprised that we didn't run into this issue as reported, I don't see
that it's an issue to correct the syntax moving forwar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11088/#review21001
---
Commit c559c40c3178873177b9f46c46e6c60b5598f2eb in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11088/#review21002
---
Commit 09d2fe6a7ddc208f77edf931ed3d57b0afcc2055 in branch refs/heads
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 09:49:12AM +, Nitin Mehta wrote:
> Would this not be a problem for folks who are already on 4.0 ?
Corrected in 4.1 branch:
commit c559c40c3178873177b9f46c46e6c60b5598f2eb
Author: Chip Childers
Date: Fri May 24 17:06:02 2013 +0100
CLOUDSTACK-528: Adding a correc
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11088/#review21015
---
Commit 09d2fe6a7ddc208f77edf931ed3d57b0afcc2055 in branch
refs/head
On 24/05/13 7:19 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>It would indeed, but since we are not going to release a 4.0.3, I fixed
>it in the 4.1 and master branches.
>
>At a minimum, this "fix" doesn't regress anything... so while I'm
>surprised that we didn't run into this issue as reported, I don't see
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11088/#review21091
---
Commit a65c36a39138308f95049a815fa99f4da0bbde1a in branch refs/heads
11 matches
Mail list logo