> On April 30, 2013, 5:42 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> > This can be discarded in favour of the new patch?
This patch needs to be in first, before the newer patch. . the newer patch
contains only the changed files. this patch has the 4 new files. These four
new files are not included in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10815/#review19941
---
This can be discarded in favour of the new patch?
- Prasanna Santha
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10815/#review19915
---
Never mind, I saw it
- Kelven Yang
On April 27, 2013, 5:28 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10815/#review19914
---
Fang, please update diff files into the review ticket
- Kelven Yang
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10815/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Kelven Yang.
Description
---
Reduce the
