RE: S3 based secondary Storage

2014-02-11 Thread Paul Angus
...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com] Sent: 10 February 2014 22:57 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: S3 based secondary Storage It seems to me that your endpoint may not be right, see this link: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/general/latest/gr

RE: S3 based secondary Storage

2014-02-11 Thread Sanjeev Neelarapu
staging storage. In this case we can uncheck staging storage part. -Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 2:51 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: S3 based secondary Storage Success! (some) I changed

RE: S3 based secondary Storage

2014-02-11 Thread Paul Angus
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: S3 based secondary Storage Hi, At least one NFS Staging storage is needed in each zone to copy storage artifacts from S3 to primary and vice-versa. While adding S3 storage NFS staging storage is optional because we can add more than one S3 storage

RE: S3 based secondary Storage

2014-02-11 Thread Paul Angus
...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Neelarapu [mailto:sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com] Sent: 11 February 2014 11:32 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: S3 based secondary Storage Yes , staging storage can be added after adding S3 storage. For adding staging storage we have

RE: S3 based secondary Storage

2014-02-11 Thread Sanjeev Neelarapu
PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: S3 based secondary Storage Hey Sanjeev, I've got system VMs downloading from S3 to the NFS cache so hopefully things will come alive soon. Can you explain (or point me to the documentation) what gets cached and how long it's kept for etc. Also

RE: S3 based secondary Storage

2014-02-10 Thread Sanjeev Neelarapu
Hi, To make sure everything is working fine with S3 , try to upload a file to s3 storage using any s3client and use the same credentials. -Sanjeev From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2014 1:50 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: S3 based

RE: S3 based secondary Storage

2014-02-10 Thread Paul Angus
08:38 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: S3 based secondary Storage Hi, To make sure everything is working fine with S3 , try to upload a file to s3 storage using any s3client and use the same credentials. -Sanjeev From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Sunday

RE: S3 based secondary Storage

2014-02-10 Thread Paul Angus
20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com] Sent: 10 February 2014 17:16 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: S3 based secondary Storage Can you try with s3cmd? If still not working, please

Re: S3 based secondary Storage

2014-02-10 Thread Min Chen
@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: S3 based secondary Storage Hi, To make sure everything is working fine with S3 , try to upload a file to s3 storage using any s3client and use the same credentials. -Sanjeev From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2014 1:50 AM To: dev

RE: S3 based secondary Storage

2014-02-10 Thread Paul Angus
@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: S3 based secondary Storage Look further into your API invoked to add S3 image store: command=addImageStoreresponse=jsonsessionkey=xqZoRDVpFezJkBlS3vqGZQzUytY=name=SecStor-S3provider=S3details[0].key=accesskeydetails[0].value=keydetails[1].key=secretkeydetails[1].value

Re: S3 based secondary Storage

2014-02-10 Thread Min Chen
@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: S3 based secondary Storage Look further into your API invoked to add S3 image store: command=addImageStoreresponse=jsonsessionkey=xqZoRDVpFezJkBlS3vqGZQzUytY =name=SecStor-S3provider=S3details[0].key=accesskeydetails[0].value=k eydetails[1].key=secretkeydetails[1].value=keydetails[2

S3 based secondary Storage

2014-02-08 Thread Paul Angus
Hi Guys, Any idea what's happening here? (see last two lines of log). I haven't seeded sec storage, because it's going to be S3 based. Unless you have to create NFS first and then migrate to it? But then the option to 'not create nfs staging area' doesn't make sense... 2014-02-08 20:11:16,770