Re: Support pure Xen as a hypervisor follow-up

On Jun 6, 2014, at 11:04 AM, Dave Scott wrote: > Hi, > > Here’s a quick status update: > > On 16 May 2014, at 15:22, Dave Scott wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 14 May 2014, at 09:53, sebgoa wrote: >> >>> >>> On Apr 9, 2014, at 2:37 PM, Dave Scott wrote: >>> Hi, Following up fr

Re: Support pure Xen as a hypervisor follow-up

On Jun 7, 2014, at 12:12 AM, Amit Das wrote: > It would be great if there's some kind of document in the wiki on this > proposal. There is one for the move to xenserver for the xen plugin. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Convert+Xen+usage+to+XenServer > > Regards, >

Re: Support pure Xen as a hypervisor follow-up

It would be great if there's some kind of document in the wiki on this proposal. Regards, Amit *CloudByte Inc.* On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Tim Mackey wrote: > If you can give me the commit ID for your HEAD, I'll check and see > what's up. It could be another c

Re: Support pure Xen as a hypervisor follow-up

If you can give me the commit ID for your HEAD, I'll check and see what's up. It could be another conflict needing resolution. -tim On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 12:16 PM, sebgoa wrote: > > On Jun 6, 2014, at 5:17 PM, Tim Mackey wrote: > >> Dave, >> >> I've submitted a merge review request >> (https:

Re: Support pure Xen as a hypervisor follow-up

On Jun 6, 2014, at 5:17 PM, Tim Mackey wrote: > Dave, > > I've submitted a merge review request > (https://reviews.apache.org/r/22270/) yesterday. Unfortunately that patch did not seem to apply cleanly. I have not dug deep though.. > If you want to avoid > having to potentially deal with a

Re: Support pure Xen as a hypervisor follow-up

Dave, I've submitted a merge review request (https://reviews.apache.org/r/22270/) yesterday. If you want to avoid having to potentially deal with a bunch of conflicts, you might want to see if your patches apply cleanly there and let me know. Happy to help with any conflict resolution. btw, I d

Re: Support pure Xen as a hypervisor follow-up

Hi, Here’s a quick status update: On 16 May 2014, at 15:22, Dave Scott wrote: > Hi, > > On 14 May 2014, at 09:53, sebgoa wrote: > >> >> On Apr 9, 2014, at 2:37 PM, Dave Scott wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Following up from Tim's "Support pure Xen as a hypervisor" proposal last >>> month[1]

Re: Support pure Xen as a hypervisor follow-up

Hi, On 14 May 2014, at 09:53, sebgoa wrote: > > On Apr 9, 2014, at 2:37 PM, Dave Scott wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Following up from Tim's "Support pure Xen as a hypervisor" proposal last >> month[1] I'd like to start working on this and maybe even make a little bit >> of progress while I'm at C

Re: Support pure Xen as a hypervisor follow-up

Thanks for the update. This is good news. On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:53 AM, sebgoa wrote: > > On Apr 9, 2014, at 2:37 PM, Dave Scott wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Following up from Tim's "Support pure Xen as a hypervisor" proposal last > month[1] I'd like to start working on this and maybe even make

Re: Support pure Xen as a hypervisor follow-up

On Apr 9, 2014, at 2:37 PM, Dave Scott wrote: > Hi, > > Following up from Tim's "Support pure Xen as a hypervisor" proposal last > month[1] I'd like to start working on this and maybe even make a little bit > of progress while I'm at CCC in Denver. > > Helpfully James Bulpin managed to get C

Support pure Xen as a hypervisor follow-up

Hi, Following up from Tim's "Support pure Xen as a hypervisor" proposal last month[1] I'd like to start working on this and maybe even make a little bit of progress while I'm at CCC in Denver. Helpfully James Bulpin managed to get CS + libvirt + xen to start an instance in a simple configurati