st mock the db layer.
>
> To me it would make sense if we use an in memory db like derby for the unit
> tests.
>
> --Alex
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 3:58 PM
>
nit
tests.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 3:58 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: TEST or integration test?
>
> For /engine/storage/integration-test, I know that those tests are Te
For /engine/storage/integration-test, I know that those tests are TestNG
test cases, requiring DB existence.
Thanks
-min
On 8/6/13 2:59 PM, "Alex Huang" wrote:
>I noticed that some of our unit tests are run in integration-test stage
>of maven. Shouldn't that be in the test phase? Does anyone
I noticed that some of our unit tests are run in integration-test stage of
maven. Shouldn't that be in the test phase? Does anyone know why it's set at
integration-test? I based this observation on the surefire plugins are set for
integration-test phase. Note the following.
./engine/orchest