Hi,
as many users before me, who wanted to upgrade to 4.0.2 on CentOS 6.4
using RPMs from http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.0/
i've hit the same error:
INFO [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseIntegrityChecker] (main:) Grabbing lock to
check for database integrity.
INFO [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseIntegrit
I've searched the web, asked on IRC and found no solution.
If there is, i'll be grateful to read it.
I'm just going to roll back and work on it another weekend, hopefully by
that time, i'll get the schema upgrade scripts.
I also think, this should be noted at least in release notes, so people
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2214
bug is described in URL above.
+1 from me. ;-)
I wish you nice weekend.
F.
On 11/5/13 3:08 PM, France wrote:
I've searched the web, asked on IRC and found no solution.
If there is, i'll be grateful to read it.
I'm just going to roll back and
On May 11, 2013, at 9:40 AM, France wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2214
> bug is described in URL above.
> +1 from me. ;-)
>
> I wish you nice weekend.
> F.
France, thanks. We are dealing with a few upgrade bugs at the moment.
We will get back to you asap.
-Sebasti
On May 13, 2013, at 10:27 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On May 11, 2013, at 9:40 AM, France wrote:
>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2214
>> bug is described in URL above.
>> +1 from me. ;-)
>>
>> I wish you nice weekend.
>> F.
>
> France, thanks. We are dealing with
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 06:24:02PM +0200, France wrote:
>
> On May 13, 2013, at 10:27 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> >
> > On May 11, 2013, at 9:40 AM, France wrote:
> >
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2214
> >> bug is described in URL above.
> >> +1 from me. ;-)
> >>
On Mon, May 13, 2013, at 11:24 AM, France wrote:
> I guess 4.1 is still a long way from being released:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/cloudstack-41-release.html
> because we haven't even hit the code freeze yet.
We're close to the 4.1.0 release - we've hit a number of upgrade
blockers, but