Hello Marty, Marcus,
Thanks for the explanation, I have updated the test accordingly.
Regards,
Girish
On 14-Sep-2013, at 9:37 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Yes, as Marty mentions they can be on any host, with tagged vlans linking
> everything together.If you prefer them on the same host you can
Yes, as Marty mentions they can be on any host, with tagged vlans linking
everything together.If you prefer them on the same host you can write a
custom allocator. The user concentrated algorithm packs VMS together when
possible, and random allocator is self explanatory, but I don't think
either pa
Hi Girish,
Virtual routers can be on different hosts to user vms as it is assumed the
VLAN used for the private user network is tagged to all the hypervisors.
Marty
On Saturday, September 14, 2013, Girish Shilamkar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was under the assumption that virtual router (VR) and vm s
Hello,
I was under the assumption that virtual router (VR) and vm spawned for an
account would always be on the same host. Therefore in
egress rule automation tests we were ssh'ing VR via host on which the vm was
created. But recently we saw failures in egress rule tests
as VR was not reachable
