My company is building a private cloud and we are moving to cloudstack. As
we begun investigating the cloudmonkey CLI we found that the output was
slightly hard to read. I have begun working on some optimizations that I
think will benefit the community and I reached out to Rohit, who
recommended th
On 30 March 2013 09:20, Justin Grudzien wrote:
>
> My company is building a private cloud and we are moving to cloudstack. As
> we begun investigating the cloudmonkey CLI we found that the output was
> slightly hard to read. I have begun working on some optimizations that I
> think will benefit th
@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: cloudmonkey printing enhancements proposal
My company is building a private cloud and we are moving to cloudstack. As we
begun investigating the cloudmonkey CLI we found that the output was slightly
hard to read. I have begun working on some optimizations that I
Hey Justin, thanks for posting this on community ML.
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Justin Grudzien wrote:
> My company is building a private cloud and we are moving to cloudstack. As
> we begun investigating the cloudmonkey CLI we found that the output was
> slightly hard to read. I have begu
Greetings,
I am posting my first patch. I am not sure exactly how to submit a patch
but I figure I will paste it here and someone will tell me the right
method. I am keeping track of the work that I am doing and as Rohit
suggested I will update the mailing list as I progress. This first patch
adds
Hi Justin, thanks for your first patch.
As per our workflows, we use git for our version control and have a
reviewboard for reviewing patches and an issue tracker for tracking
bugs/features.
Git:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Git
Review board:
https://reviews.apache.org
Thanks for the information. If you haven't already put the patch for review
I would like to do so and follow the directions so I can get used to the
process. Let me know. Also, I saw the lambda functions and chose not to use
them because I think they make the code harder to read for the more novice
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 05:56:11AM -0500, Justin Grudzien wrote:
> Thanks for the information. If you haven't already put the patch for review
> I would like to do so and follow the directions so I can get used to the
> process. Let me know.
Go for it Justin.
Also, give me your Jira ID once you
> -Original Message-
> From: prasanna [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 10:16 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: cloudmonkey printing enhancements proposal
>
> On 30 March 2013 09:20, Justin Grudzien wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Grudzien [mailto:grudz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 3:56 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: cloudmonkey printing enhancements proposal
>
> Thanks for the information. If you haven't already
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Justin Grudzien wrote:
> Thanks for the information. If you haven't already put the patch for review
> I would like to do so and follow the directions so I can get used to the
> process. Let me know. Also, I saw the lambda functions and chose not to use
> them beca
I created CLOUDSTACK-1875 for the JSON enhancements. I am going to begin
filling out the ticket with the work that I have done and I will submit the
first patch as soon as I figure out the rest of the non-comitter steps. I
should be able to make my first patch submission attempt tomorrow. Thanks
fo
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:21:34PM -0500, Justin Grudzien wrote:
> I created CLOUDSTACK-1875 for the JSON enhancements. I am going to begin
> filling out the ticket with the work that I have done and I will submit the
> first patch as soon as I figure out the rest of the non-comitter steps. I
> sho
>> >
>>
>> +1 - JSON output would make it very good to consume into other api
>> response processing. Right now cloudmonkey actually isn't aware of the
>> response object model. For certain API responses that return embedded
>> objects (eg: listNetworks [1]) it would be good to return the JSON
>> a
Rohit,
I submitted my first patch to review board. Can you please take a look when you
get a moment I want to make sure I did everything correctly. Also, other than
submit to review board do I need to forward anything to the dev mailing list
saying that I have a review request or will the revie
15 matches
Mail list logo
