Why do this in 410to420? It won't get corrected on upgrades that are
already at 4.2.x - realistically it probably needs to be in a 421to422
if we plan on a 4.2.2 or 421to430.
--David
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:22 PM, d...@apache.org wrote:
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/4.3 c375ec62e -
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:32 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Why do this in 410to420? It won't get corrected on upgrades that are
already at 4.2.x - realistically it probably needs to be in a 421to422
if we plan on a 4.2.2 or 421to430.
it doesn't mean it won't be done.
alter table
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
but that won't help people doing
an upgrade as they will pass by the 410to420 script.
reading the source we are both right. I will add the alter table
statement as well (to 4.3 and 4.4 scripts)
alter table is good enough.
2014/1/16 Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
but that won't help people doing
an upgrade as they will pass by the 410to420 script.
reading the source we are both right. I will
it seems to me it is not for those who will run into a to large cidr
list. For those installations the management server upgrade step will
fail and the ms will stop. both the alter table and the altered create
statement are needed.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com
sorry Wei Zou, David, I take that back. only people with large cidr
lists that upgrade to 4.2.1 will suffer indeed.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
it seems to me it is not for those who will run into a to large cidr
list. For those installations
