utchoang opened a new pull request #799:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/799
Fixes #794
@rhtyd cc @svenvogel Please review it. Thanks.
 {
Pearl1594 commented on pull request #796:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/796#issuecomment-706968685
@rhtyd added check for existence of API
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
Pearl1594 commented on pull request #796:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/796#issuecomment-706969116
@blueorangutan package
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the m
blueorangutan commented on pull request #796:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/796#issuecomment-706969473
@Pearl1594 a Jenkins job has been kicked to build primate packages. I'll
keep you posted as I make progress.
---
blueorangutan commented on pull request #797:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/797#issuecomment-706969370
Packaging result: :heavy_check_mark:centos :heavy_check_mark:debian
:heavy_check_mark:archive.
QA: http://primate-qa.cloudstack.cloud:8080/client/pr/797 (JID-3
blueorangutan commented on pull request #796:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/796#issuecomment-706974289
Packaging result: :heavy_check_mark:centos :heavy_check_mark:debian
:heavy_check_mark:archive.
QA: http://primate-qa.cloudstack.cloud:8080/client/pr/796 (JID-3
DaanHoogland commented on pull request #77:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/77#issuecomment-707012569
followed that ^^ hope there is a wait time, as i don't see changes just yet
This is an automated message
rhtyd merged pull request #795:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/795
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
rhtyd commented on issue #793:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/793#issuecomment-707019058
Confirmed.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
rhtyd closed issue #793:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/793
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
rhtyd merged pull request #796:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/796
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
rhtyd merged pull request #777:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/777
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
rhtyd closed issue #782:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/782
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
rhtyd commented on issue #782:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/782#issuecomment-707020559
I'm unable to reproduce, please re-open if you are @vladimirpetrov thanks.
This is an automated message from
rhtyd merged pull request #797:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/797
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
rhtyd closed pull request #799:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/799
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
rhtyd commented on pull request #799:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/799#issuecomment-707022287
Sorry @utchoang the fix was not well explained in the bug ticket. We would
want to allow both vlan/vxlan for guest traffic etc. It is possible to have
this, also as per
rhtyd commented on issue #794:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/794#issuecomment-707022707
The API doc says for addTrafficType API:
```
isolationmethod string Used if physical network has multiple iso
lation types
rhtyd closed issue #794:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/794
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
rhtyd commented on issue #801:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/801#issuecomment-707025765
Was the private registry feature implemented in backend cc @davidjumani
@shwstppr @Pearl1594 ?
This is an au
rhtyd commented on issue #798:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/798#issuecomment-707026068
+1 (if there is an easy fix, I don't mind adding it for 1.0)
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #794:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/794#issuecomment-707026171
alright... that is news to me (what about mgmt/storage, etc) - let's leave
it for now. we can always revise later.
-
rhtyd commented on issue #743:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/743#issuecomment-707027026
There is a instance groups tab now which can be used to see various groups.
Maybe we can revisit this in 1.1.
---
rhtyd commented on issue #801:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/801#issuecomment-707027480
Please triage and then fix for 1.0 or move to 1.1 if the backend does not
support private registry feature.
rhtyd closed issue #794:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/794
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
rhtyd commented on issue #794:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/794#issuecomment-707037983
Thanks closing on your remark.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the me
Hi,
I'm currently working on adding support for CloudStack as a cloud provider for
Kubernetes to allow it to dynamically scale the cluster size based on capacity
requirements.
It runs as a separate pod in its own deployment and requires an API and Secret
key to communicate with CloudStack.
Whi
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #743:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/743#issuecomment-707046208
ok, lets target 1.1, not closing the issue..?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git S
Pearl1594 opened a new pull request #802:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/802
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
UR
David,
as a general principle an API called scale should not be used to
configure autoscaling of in my opinion.
So option 1 seems the best to me (an submitYamlForKubernetes-API?) However
instead of requiring an yaml we could just ask for the required fields
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 12:51 PM David
Hi Daan,
Thanks for your feedback!
Wrt the ideas, Submitting a yaml to an API would be redundant since the user
can deploy it himself.
The API proposal was to simplify it for the user so they can just pass min /
max size as well as API keys if needed (so no tweaking a yaml file)
The scaleAPI cou
davidjumani commented on issue #798:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/798#issuecomment-707055908
There could be a simple fix for autogenerated forms. Can add that now and
change the custom forms later
---
davidjumani commented on pull request #802:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/802#issuecomment-707058475
Fixes https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/801
This is an automated message from th
I prefer providing an API to customers with necessary parameters rather than
providing yaml files to them. Using API we can do automation also and editing
yaml files can be sometimes messy
Sent from my iPhone
> On 12-Oct-2020, at 1:13 PM, David Jumani wrote:
>
> Hi Daan,
>
> Thanks for your
Pearl1594 commented on pull request #802:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/802#issuecomment-707084264
@blueorangutan package
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the m
blueorangutan commented on pull request #802:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/802#issuecomment-707084780
@Pearl1594 a Jenkins job has been kicked to build primate packages. I'll
keep you posted as I make progress.
---
Thanks Rakesh.
Do you think it would be better to have the user provide the API keys or create
a service account and use its keys?
From: Rakesh v
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 5:12 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Kubernetes Cl
blueorangutan commented on pull request #802:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/802#issuecomment-707089102
Packaging result: :heavy_check_mark:centos :heavy_check_mark:debian
:heavy_check_mark:archive.
QA: http://primate-qa.cloudstack.cloud:8080/client/pr/802 (JID-3
Davis, how about a separate API called setAutoScalingParameter or
setAutoScalingLimits?
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 2:19 PM David Jumani
wrote:
> Thanks Rakesh.
> Do you think it would be better to have the user provide the API keys or
> create a service account and use its keys?
>
> ___
ACSGitBot commented on pull request #162:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/162#issuecomment-707110268
Your request had been received, i'll go and build the documentation and
check the output log for errors.
This shouldn't take long.
GabrielBrascher commented on pull request #162:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/162#issuecomment-707110215
requesting docbuild
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
ACSGitBot commented on pull request #162:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/162#issuecomment-707111510
Build finished. You can review it at:
https://acs-www.shapeblue.com/docs/WIP-PROOFING/pr162
Build Log Output:
No log errors found to report
vladimirpetrov commented on issue #782:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/782#issuecomment-707114300
I confirm, the bug is no longer present.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
T
)
Comment from Hari:
For fixed disk offerings we need to have data disk offerings which are
either 5GB and above or custom disk offerings, since the data disk is of 5GB it
is looking for suitable disk offerings. The one in the screenshots are less
than 5GB
