Re: [Vote] Releasing 2.1.1

2003-09-13 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Niclas Hedhman dijo: > On Saturday 13 September 2003 20:46, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: >> > Writing DOS comes to mind my the interesting means of this abrev. >> for today world (Denial of services) I wonder think of what will >> means Windows >> > in the future of the Internet! >> >> what about >> >>

Re: [Vote] Releasing 2.1.1

2003-09-13 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Saturday 13 September 2003 20:46, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > Writing DOS comes to mind my the interesting means of this abrev. for > > today world (Denial of services) I wonder think of what will means > > Windows > > in the future of the Internet! > > what about > > Windows Intruding Nicely D

Re: [RT] Starting 2.2

2003-09-13 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Saturday 13 September 2003 18:40, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > let's do a quick poll: who would be absolutely against using Subversion > for the Cocoon 2.2 tree (granted that we can safely import the existing > CVS tree into it)? > > state your reasons and try to be as less inertial and defensive

Re: Portal dependency on JDOM is overrated?

2003-09-13 Thread Joerg Heinicke
Carsten is in holidays for three weeks, but maybe one of the other S&N people knows (Matthew, Guido)?? Was it planned to replace W3C DOM with JDOM or the other way around? Joerg Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Couple of portal files: cocoon-2.1\src\blocks\portal\java\org\apache\cocoon\portal\applicati

Re: [Vote] Releasing 2.1.1

2003-09-13 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Stefano Mazzocchi dijo: > > On Thursday, Sep 4, 2003, at 16:21 Europe/Rome, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > >> Antonio Gallardo wrote: >>> >>> Carsten Ziegeler dijo: Giacomo Pati wrote: >> I would love to, but it is - for any reason - not accessible > from here right >> now - only the tu

Re: [RT] Implementing Cocoon Blocks

2003-09-13 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
On Saturday, Sep 13, 2003, at 21:06 Europe/Rome, Geoff Howard wrote: 4) changed "configuration" in "configurations" to identify a container that can contain one or more parameters. I took the liberty of changing this from configurations to parameters since in my mind configuration already refe

Re: [RT] Implementing Cocoon Blocks

2003-09-13 Thread Geoff Howard
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: On Friday, Aug 29, 2003, at 05:53 Europe/Rome, Geoff Howard wrote: Wiki'd here: http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=BlocksWiring For sake of discussion, I recorded a wire-id instead of the location. Can blocks be in other locations other than WEB-INF/blocks/{$wire-i

Re: [RT] Implementing Cocoon Blocks

2003-09-13 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
On Sunday, Aug 31, 2003, at 15:04 Europe/Rome, Christian Haul wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: On Wednesday, Aug 27, 2003, at 11:35 Europe/Rome, Christian Haul wrote: Which is the whole point of my mail. Don't use dependency ranges, use metadata specifying capabilities and requirements for this. I

Portal dependency on JDOM is overrated?

2003-09-13 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Couple of portal files: cocoon-2.1\src\blocks\portal\java\org\apache\cocoon\portal\application\PortalApplicationConfig.java cocoon-2.1\src\blocks\portal\java\org\apache\cocoon\portal\application\PortalApplicationConfigFactory.java excplicitly mention JDOM in theirs Javadoc. But anywhere in code

Re: [headsup] JSR 170 v0.8 Community Review

2003-09-13 Thread Andrew Savory
Hi Stefano (welcome back, hope you had a good holiday!), On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > You should be able to find the spec here: > > > http://www.jcp.org/en/eg/download/jsr170-v0.8-community- > > draft.zip?id=170&fileId=1121 That URL results in a username/password prompt. Acc

Re: Real blocks: some thoughts and questions

2003-09-13 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
On Thursday, Sep 11, 2003, at 20:11 Europe/Rome, Bruno Dumon wrote: I've been reading through the most recent block related threads: Cocoon Blocks 1.1 [1] and Implementing Cocoon Blocks [2]. These two documents pretty much complement each other, the first mostly focussing on the blocks itself (not

Re: [RT] Implementing Cocoon Blocks

2003-09-13 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
On Wednesday, Sep 10, 2003, at 13:47 Europe/Rome, Geoff Howard wrote: Aha, I understand the issue now. And next to staging and live servers there are of course also the development servers or workstations. So there are parameters which will be common for all installations and parameters which can

Re: [RT] Implementing Cocoon Blocks

2003-09-13 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
On Wednesday, Sep 10, 2003, at 13:39 Europe/Rome, Geoff Howard wrote: Bruno Dumon wrote: On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 17:02, Geoff Howard wrote: ... I also considered recording the wire-id instead of the uri for connections between blocks - what are the arguments for each? was out of the blue using

Re: [Vote] Releasing 2.1.1

2003-09-13 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
On Thursday, Sep 4, 2003, at 16:21 Europe/Rome, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Antonio Gallardo wrote: Carsten Ziegeler dijo: Giacomo Pati wrote: I would love to, but it is - for any reason - not accessible from here right now - only the tutorial. And there I found the periodic trigger :) Go blame you IS

Re: [Vote] Releasing 2.1.1

2003-09-13 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
On Thursday, Sep 4, 2003, at 16:13 Europe/Rome, Antonio Gallardo wrote: Giacomo Pati dijo: Have a look at http://quartz.sourceforge.net/javadoc/org/quartz/CronTrigger.html for more details. I would love to, but it is - for any reason - not accessible from here right now - only the tutorial. And

Re: Future build (was RE: [Vote] Releasing 2.1.1)

2003-09-13 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
On Thursday, Sep 4, 2003, at 08:27 Europe/Rome, Jeff Ramsdale wrote: I expect the average new Cocoon user is also a Windows user (though I could be wrong). So why are the snapshots not in .zip format? FYI: WinZip supports tar.gz files just fine. That may be (and I suspected as much), but WinZip

Re: [RT] Implementing Cocoon Blocks

2003-09-13 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
On Monday, Sep 1, 2003, at 16:59 Europe/Rome, Hunsberger, Peter wrote: Geoff Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: But this brings up another point - what to do if the wiring.xml and others is deleted? Presumably, all blocks are "uninstalled" in this state, but what does this do to persistence re

Re: [RT] Starting 2.2

2003-09-13 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
On Friday, Aug 29, 2003, at 20:27 Europe/Rome, Jay Freeman ((saurik)) wrote: Stefano: I totally agree on the "evolution" thing. To start, the process of moving to Subversion would be a repository import, not starting from scratch. As for tools: http://subclipse.tigris.org/ (Subversion plugin

Re: [RT] Implementing Cocoon Blocks

2003-09-13 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
On Friday, Aug 29, 2003, at 18:27 Europe/Rome, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Temp dir: I've been assuming this file and dir structure is the persistent state for the block manager. The only servlet engine which wipes out deployment (aka temp, aka staging) directory on restart is Jetty. None of the ot

[headsup] JSR 170 v0.8 Community Review

2003-09-13 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
I'm happy to announce that after years of work, the JSR 170 expert group has been released the JSR 170 v0.8 for community review. After a period of inactivity, I'm back in that expert group (and pushed a little for this community review to happen sooner rather than later, but didn't find an

Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/deprecated/java/org/apache/cocoon/components/xpath JaxenProcessorImpl.java XPathProcessor.java XPathProcessorImpl.java

2003-09-13 Thread Joerg Heinicke
Can we also remove JDOM completely? I didn't see any relation to the Cocoon project and could exclude it from build without any problems with compiling. But I have no Cocoon at the moment after my Computer crashed (as it did more often in the last weeks), NTFS got broken and Windows didn't want