Are there any possibilities to solve the problem?
Dietmar
- Original Message -
From: Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 5:20 AM
Subject: Re: Problems with capture logicsheet function dom-variable
Dietmar Schlar wrote:
I was
Is 2.2 still trying to be compatible with J2SE 1.3 or we can safely
assume that 1.4 is going to be a J2SE 1.4 only release?
Pier (pondering on memory mappings)
On 20 Feb 2004, at 10:52, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Am 14:01 10.02.2004 -0500 schrieb Steve Krulewitz:
Does anyone know what happened to
On 22 Feb 2004, at 14:30, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Is 2.2 still trying to be compatible with J2SE 1.3 or we can safely
assume that 1.4 is going to be a J2SE 1.4 only release?
I'm +1 on 1.4 for 2.2.
/Steven
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Is 2.2 still trying to be compatible with J2SE 1.3 or we can
safely assume that 1.4 is going to be a J2SE 1.4 only release?
We haven't discussed/decided this :) If 1.4 is available on all
important plattforms than there is nothing imho against using
1.4 features.
Until
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 4:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Jisp 3.0 moved to GPL licence
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Is 2.2 still trying to be compatible with J2SE 1.3 or we can
safely assume
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27063.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25093.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le Samedi, 21 fév 2004, à 17:13 Europe/Zurich, Christopher Oliver a
écrit :
...I did some informal tests and it appears to actually be slower
than interpreted Rhino (not sure exactly why, perhaps because Rhino
bytecodes are higher level), but was significantly
Christopher Oliver wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le Samedi, 21 fév 2004, à 17:13 Europe/Zurich, Christopher Oliver a
écrit :
...I did some informal tests and it appears to actually be slower
than interpreted Rhino (not sure exactly why, perhaps because Rhino
bytecodes are higher level),
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27146.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27146.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27146.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27147.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
14 matches
Mail list logo
