Instrumentation / JMX (Was RE: New Sitemap Treeprocessor for 2.2 [Instrumentation / JMX Now])

Hiya, I guess the first step would be to look at the code for the Excalibur instrumentation-client - which is all I've been using. I'm probably preaching to the choir, but to get a quick look at what's already there, just run (from your Cocoon root directory): build start-instrumentation-clien

RE: New Sitemap Treeprocessor for 2.2 [Instrumentation / JMX Now]

I think it is a matter of who can get to it first. I'm just getting started on figuring out how to instrument our product. Part of this will be to gather whatever Cocoon is already making available. I haven't had a chance to really figure out how to interface with the Instrumentation stuff so it

RE: New Sitemap Treeprocessor for 2.2 [Instrumentation / JMX Now]

Ahh, ok, it seems that I missed the JMX thread: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10784156763&r=1&w=2 I've been using Instrumentation quite successfully for a couple of weeks, it was how I managed to pick up a bug in the CIncludeTransformer, and it's helped hugely in some fairly complex pool d

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27818] - Cannot execute method named as "delete" from javascript in flow

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27818] New: - Cannot execute method named as "delete" from javascript in flow

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: current CVS: XSP broken

On Mar 20, 2004, at 4:14 PM, Joerg Heinicke wrote: On 19.03.2004 17:52, leo leonid wrote: all my xsp stopped working after updating to the current CVS. What happend? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=107964359715995&w=4 Unfortunately there is no response until now. Joerg hmmm, pr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27785] - [PATCH] Form redisplays with validation errors after submit from

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: New Sitemap Treeprocessor for 2.2

Ralph Goers wrote: I'm also interested in Cocoon management and monitoring. But rather than using the Excalibur instrumentation I would like to suggest that JMX MBeans be used instead, since that is really what the management tools want these days. Big +1, JMX is indeed the way today. -- Gianugo

RE: New Sitemap Treeprocessor for 2.2

I'm also interested in Cocoon management and monitoring. But rather than using the Excalibur instrumentation I would like to suggest that JMX MBeans be used instead, since that is really what the management tools want these days. Ralph -Original Message- From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EM

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27785] - [PATCH] Form redisplays with validation errors after submit from

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: AbstractXMLProducer patch consequences

On 20.03.2004 01:31, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Modified:src/java/org/apache/cocoon/xml AbstractXMLProducer.java Log: fixed bug 27678, thanks to Peter Brant: setConsumer() calls setContentHandler() + setLexicalHandler() public void setConsumer(XMLConsumer consumer) { this

Re: current CVS: XSP broken

On 19.03.2004 17:52, leo leonid wrote: all my xsp stopped working after updating to the current CVS. What happend? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=107964359715995&w=4 Unfortunately there is no response until now. Joerg hmmm, probably I'm the only one who still uses XSP, but I'd

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27467] - Upgrade all source files to ASF 2.0 license

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: New Sitemap Treeprocessor for 2.2

Hi Corin, to be honest, I don't have any plans for this :) Now, I want to make the tree processor implementation capable of plugging some profiling things in. That's the first step. I'm not sure about excalibur instrument as it isn't maintained anymore as far as i know. Carsten _

RE: New Sitemap Treeprocessor for 2.2

--- Begin Message --- Hi Carsten, Great to hear that you're working on this one. Do you plan to expose your profiling via the Instrumentation interfaces? I've found the excalibur instrument tools very useful of late and wonder whether it could be appropriate to use them here. Of course, it

Re: FYI: New Sitemap Treeprocessor for 2.2

Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Hi, to avoid double efforts in the same area, I just wanted to inform you that I will try to write a new tree processor for 2.2 in the next few days. Why? There are several reasons: - Reverting to ECM in 2.2 requires some changes to the tree processor used in 2.1.x anyway

FYI: New Sitemap Treeprocessor for 2.2

Hi, to avoid double efforts in the same area, I just wanted to inform you that I will try to write a new tree processor for 2.2 in the next few days. Why? There are several reasons: - Reverting to ECM in 2.2 requires some changes to the tree processor used in 2.1.x anyway - Implementing Virtual