On 25 Aug 2004, at 02:17, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 24 Aug 2004, at 22:28, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Ahhh FOR CRYING OUT LOUD! :-( I don't have access to Subversion
:-(
svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: MKACTIVITY of
I've updated the web site from what is in SubVersion...
It was still pointing to the old CVS structure...
If I screwed something up badly, well, everything is still available in
a subdir called FROM-CVS...
I'm also going to update the javadocs on line to reflect the changes in
the URLs on
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 25 Aug 2004, at 02:17, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 24 Aug 2004, at 22:28, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Ahhh FOR CRYING OUT LOUD! :-( I don't have access to Subversion :-(
svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: MKACTIVITY of
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 25 Aug 2004, at 02:17, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 24 Aug 2004, at 22:28, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Ahhh FOR CRYING OUT LOUD! :-( I don't have access to Subversion
:-(
Commit failed (details follow):
Hi,
The sorting option for the directorygenerator has a mistake in it. It
states that the parameter time should be used to sort the files by
time. The source however reads a parameter called lastmodified.
I assumed that The Source Is Always Right and patched the docs. The
patch is against the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30849.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30849.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Checked and fixed... Thanks!
Pier
On 25 Aug 2004, at 15:55, Jorg Heymans wrote:
Hi,
The sorting option for the directorygenerator has a mistake in it. It
states that the parameter time should be used to sort the files by
time. The source however reads a parameter called lastmodified.
I'm rebuilding the site and javadocs, and I seriously fail the point of
checking in generated javadocs...
There are something like more than 5600 files, and my SVN is crashing...
Plus, we're wasting resources for something that can be so easily
generated (even on minotaur):
# svn co
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
I'm rebuilding the site and javadocs, and I seriously fail the point of
checking in generated javadocs...
There are something like more than 5600 files, and my SVN is crashing...
Plus, we're wasting resources for something that can be so easily
generated (even on
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
I'm rebuilding the site and javadocs, and I seriously fail the point of
checking in generated javadocs...
It's useful to have javadocs on the site, but on SVN it's useless.
+1 to remove them
Why not simply put them on http://www.jdocs.com/ ?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Ok for the site, but the APIs, it's just a waste...
+1 take them out
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
http://scplugin.tigris.org/
Pier
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On 25 Aug 2004, at 11:34, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
I've updated the web site from what is in SubVersion...
It was still pointing to the old CVS structure...
If I screwed something up badly, well, everything is still available
in a subdir called FROM-CVS...
I'm also going to update the javadocs on
I don't know if this is on topic or not, but a couple of observations:
1. The contributing page discusses CVS and not subversion. I had to guess
at how to create a patch (it is easier than it was with CVS).
2. The code repository is using viewcvs. Is it looking at the old CVS
repository or the
15 matches
Mail list logo
