Il giorno 30/ott/04, alle 20:05, Unico Hommes ha scritto:
Rather than undoing all the changes (would make me really feel bad
about the wasted time I invested :-) I think it is no problem to
provide compatibility. I think that all that is needed is that
block/lib is added to the block
Leszek Gawron dijo:
I think that all templating languages that are not xml based will also
introduce character encoding problems.
Yep.
I say: let's stick to JXTG just add some power with the ability to write
more sophisticated macros/taglibs.
hint tm=CZThe next line is not a formal
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Hi Sylvain:
I am sorry for being late. I am trying to keep up to date, but it is hard
to me now. :-(
I think, I found a problem with the current implementation of this feature.
As all you already know, Jeremy requested me to help in a interesing
sample using Lucene and OJB,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31992.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
hi people
There is some javascript code that live in any produced CForm
..
..
script type=text/javascript
src=resources/mattkruse-lib/AnchorPosition.js/scriptscript
type=text/javascript
src=resources/mattkruse-lib/PopupWindow.js/scriptscript
type=text/javascript
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
Ralph Goers wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Ugo Cei wrote:
Looks like this is not a backward-compatible change. Blocks which are
distributed outside of Cocoon (like Fins or my Spring Petstore) must
change their deployment instructions to add all those depend
elements (and put dependencies in gump
Ugo Cei wrote:
Il giorno 30/ott/04, alle 20:05, Unico Hommes ha scritto:
Rather than undoing all the changes (would make me really feel bad
about the wasted time I invested :-) I think it is no problem to
provide compatibility. I think that all that is needed is that
block/lib is added to the
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
How can I retrieve that ID? I could implement a test version for Carsten.
It is in AbstractInterpreter.getInterpreterID()
Some problems coming. Are there any reasons why doesn't
Interpreter.getInterpreterID() exist? Also
AbstractInterpreter.getInterpreterID() is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: cziegeler
Date: Sun Oct 31 10:32:28 2004
New Revision: 56145
Modified:
cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/java/org/apache/cocoon/components/CocoonComponentManager.java
Log:
Revert commit 55286 which causes NPEs and other exceptions with the cocoon protocol -
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26445.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29401.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29401.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29945.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Oct 30, 2004, at 5:53 AM, Ugo Cei wrote:
Il giorno 30/ott/04, alle 10:00, Ugo Cei ha scritto:
I will test it again and update the docs ASAP. Thanks for letting me know.
Done.
Thanks, Ugo!
One slight omission... need to add library name=hibernate2/> for it to work OOtB...
Cheers,
~ml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29945.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Il giorno 31/ott/04, alle 23:25, Mark Lundquist ha scritto:
One slight omission... need to add library name=hibernate2/ for it
to work OOtB...
Thanks for catching it. I've updated the page.
Ugo
--
Ugo Cei - http://beblogging.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project cocoon-block-xsp has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project cocoon-block-midi has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project cocoon-block-bsf has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project cocoon-block-proxy has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project cocoon-block-cron has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Gump wrote:
Project cocoon-block-xsp has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 26 projects.
[...]
gump-block:
cocoon-block-paranoid:
cocoon-block-paranoid-prepare:
[mkdir] Created dir:
On 1 Nov 2004, at 02:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: pier
Date: Sun Oct 31 18:10:16 2004
New Revision: 56181
Log:
Adding new dependancy-injection based Kernel
Just finished writing, please, no comments as of yet... It will MOST
DEFINITELY not work, as it's something put together over a
Hi all,
I'd like to know if a fd:case for the union widget is still planned to
give more flexibility than the fd:struct or if there is another way to give a matching expression
to the fd:struct.
Regards,
Phil
25 matches
Mail list logo
