Automated build for cocoon-docs FAILED
Log attached.
--
Forrestbot run ended at 11 December 02:13 AM
Using Forrest 0.8-dev
Forrestbot administrator: ForrestBot
--
[echo]
... Forrest render START 2005-12-11 02:02:37
... Rendering docs in
/export/home/
On Saturday 10 December 2005 19:20, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > The orthogonality of Cocoon has "died". Noone talks about views. Noone
> > highlights the ability to serve same content to many user agents. Noone
> > is interested in truly useful smaller components. Noone ca
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
What can we do?
Two things:
1) breath and relax, we are not going to get run over: changing the
slope does *NOT* change the nature of the function (they will
understand that as soon as they cross that equi-cost point... and
complexity grows even faster the more "
On 08.12.2005, at 19:21, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:Cocoon is what it is today, but what it is tomorrow is defined by what we, collectively, decide.Amen :)...I also started a long-winded response to this big thread(s) butsince at least a little crowd is going to meet soon at the ApacheConI ended up th
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project cocoon-block-portal has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project cocoon-block-portal has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
So I guess the best of both worlds would be jruby. I'm not real sure
where this project is at, but I know it's been getting at least some
lovin.
On 12/6/05, Irv Salisbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I write here is just one vote, but maybe others think the same.
>
> For all of our enterpri
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Friday 09 December 2005 02:21, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
And in terms of moving the "equi-cost" point to the left, there are two
fundmentally different variables to consider.
for instance, if t
y = a * b / x `
\/
total cost of owners
I pretty much agrees with what Berin has been saying - and I also
agree with Stefano.
Berin is right in that we must strive for simplicity.
Stefano is right in that a (somewhat) complex system is required to
solve even more complex problems.
The problem with Cocoon as I see it is this:
Think abo
On Friday 09 December 2005 02:21, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
And in terms of moving the "equi-cost" point to the left, there are two
fundmentally different variables to consider.
for instance, if t
y = a * b / x `
\/
total cost of ownership (y)
^
|
On Thursday 08 December 2005 02:10, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
> With this I
> measn that you can use the parts of Cocoon that you like, in the way you
> like in your webapp, without having to buy a whole religion.
Being a devout atheist, I must +1000 this one.
Niclas
11 matches
Mail list logo
