[jira] Updated: (COCOON-1861) Check for Null URI in LDAPTransformer

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1861?page=all ] Igor Naumov updated COCOON-1861: Attachment: LDAP stacktrace.htm This is a stacktrace from a simplified pipeline including LDAP transformer. I had to remove some path references for security

[jira] Updated: (COCOON-1861) Check for Null URI in LDAPTransformer

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1861?page=all ] Igor Naumov updated COCOON-1861: Attachment: authenticateLDAP.xml This is a sample XML that I feed to the LDAP transformer that causes the NullPointerException Check for Null URI in

[jira] Commented: (COCOON-1861) Check for Null URI in LDAPTransformer

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1861?page=comments#action_12416462 ] Igor Naumov commented on COCOON-1861: - I attached the stacktrace (from Cocoon 2.1.9 running on Tomcat 5 - so it's not just SAP NetWeaver) and a sample XML that I apply

Re: [cforms] New ProcessingPhases added a repeater bug?

Antonio Gallardo wrote: Hi Leo, Thanks for the input! It's now fixed: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=414691view=rev Can you please explain why it works if the events are fired from flowscript and why it does not work if they're fired from the binding framework. I think we should try to

Re: [Vote] New committers

Joerg Heinicke wrote: 1. Andreas Hochsteger 2. Peter Hunsberger 3. Jason Johnston +1 for all three Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, SN AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/

[jira] Created: (COCOON-1864) RepeaterJXPathBinding - order of row is inverted

RepeaterJXPathBinding - order of row is inverted Key: COCOON-1864 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1864 Project: Cocoon Type: Bug Components: Blocks: Forms Versions: 2.1.8, 2.1.9

Proposal for web service proxy transformer

Hi All, Does the community agree that a new Cocoon SOAP proxy transformer could better support the increasing demand for SOA applications realised through SOAP Web services? I ask this because having used the WSProxyGenerator for a REST web service

[jira] Commented: (COCOON-1863) Save form model with empty fields: Binding model to document fails

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1863?page=comments#action_12416469 ] Feliciano Borrego commented on COCOON-1863: --- In the Cocoon example form2xml.flow, submiting the form with the field Please enter your IP address empty, the

[jira] Commented: (COCOON-1863) Save form model with empty fields: Binding model to document fails

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1863?page=comments#action_12416476 ] Feliciano Borrego commented on COCOON-1863: --- The XML of fd:aggregatefield id=phone required=true is: * Cocoon 2.1.8 : phone cntr= zone/

Unresolvable dependencies

Does anybody know which repos provide following artifacts? portal block: dependency groupIdwsrp4j/groupId artifactIdwsrp4j-consumer/artifactId version0.3-dev/version /dependency (+ all other wsrp4j artifacts) myfaces block: dependency groupIdmyfaces/groupId

Re: [2.2] Release?

Ralph Goers wrote: I have no problem with this release as a first step, but I'd hesitate to even call it 2.2M1. OTOH, if I had an idea of what our subsequent milestones are this might make more sense to me. Good point! Now, if you something label milestone or beta people have a specific

Re: [cforms] New ProcessingPhases added a repeater bug?

Carsten Ziegeler escribió: Antonio Gallardo wrote: Hi Leo, Thanks for the input! It's now fixed: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=414691view=rev Hi Carsten, Thanks for taking your time for reviewing this. :-) Can you please explain why it works if the events are fired from

Re: [cforms] New ProcessingPhases added a repeater bug?

Antonio Gallardo wrote: It's not it does not work. The code was moved out because this seems to be a better place for firing form events. This events are form events, hence the form should fire them as needed. IMHO, the binding framework does not need to know/care about special form

Re: [2.2] Release?

Jorg Heymans wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: to release. This way the release plugin should work for us as expected and we don't have to maniupulate any POMs directly. WDOT? Well, *theoretically* it __should__ yes. Note that I don't want to sound too negative here, i really hope you can

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32751] - Serious problem with cinclude and caching

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32751. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: cocoon 2.1.8 - RepeaterJXPathBinding, order of rows is inverted

Antonio, thanks for the response.. I added the issue to Jira under COCOON-1864 http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1864. regards, Dennis Dam Antonio Gallardo wrote: Hi Dennis, thanks for your contribution. Would you kindly add it to our issues traking system [1]? Many thanks in

Re: cocoon 2.1.8 - RepeaterJXPathBinding, order of rows is inverted

Dennis Dam escribió: Antonio, thanks for the response.. I added the issue to Jira under COCOON-1864 http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1864. Hi Dennis, Great. Let me see what I can do this weekend. :-) Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo

[jira] Created: (COCOON-1865) Javaflow runtime error when cocoon is built and ran using java 1.5

Javaflow runtime error when cocoon is built and ran using java 1.5 -- Key: COCOON-1865 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1865 Project: Cocoon Type: Bug Components: Blocks: Java Flow

[jira] Closed: (COCOON-1865) Javaflow runtime error when cocoon is built and ran using java 1.5

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1865?page=all ] Antonio Gallardo closed COCOON-1865: Fix Version: 2.1.10-dev (current SVN) Resolution: Invalid My mistake. Sorry for the loud. Javaflow runtime error when cocoon is built and

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32751] - Serious problem with cinclude and caching

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32751. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.