Re: [cocoon-2.2] Servlet source description (was: Deprecation)

2007-11-08 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Vadim Gritsenko pisze: > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: >> Yepp, but unfortunately too many people rely on these side-effects :( > > Is there place where differences between servlet: and cocoon: sources > are described? Or, at least, where servlet: source is described? For

Re: [cocoon-2.2] Deprecation

2007-11-08 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Joerg Heinicke pisze: > It seems we do not even know the requirements. How do you want to decide > about architecture without them? My guess - since Cocoon is just a > framework - you merely get the requirements from real applications built > on it. Why can't we wait until the people get used to th

Re: [cocoon-2.2] Deprecation

2007-11-08 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Thinking more about incompatibilities between cocoon: and servlet: protocols I'm getting an impressions that they are not such fundamentally different when it comes to their usage schemes. Of course they differ in many details but as Reinhard

Re: [cocoon-2.2] Deprecation

2007-11-08 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 07.11.2007 15:52 Uhr, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Now, at some point we have to break compatibility to get a cleaner architecture and an even better way of doing things. Perhaps removing sub sitemaps is one of these things, perhaps not. Before we start to think about migration path and embe

Re: [cocoon-2.2] Deprecation

2007-11-08 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: > Carsten Ziegeler pisze: >> Yes, that's true. Now, at some point we have to break compatibility to >> get a cleaner architecture and >> an even better way of doing things. Perhaps removing sub sitemaps is one >> of these things, perhaps not. > > Before we start to thi