On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 22:17 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote:
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 09:10 -0600, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Hi,
There is a worst case scenario now: What if they don't collect
enough
money from subscriptions and do the next step: remove the 3 months
Ralph Goers wrote:
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 09:10 -0600, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Hi,
There is a worst case scenario now: What if they don't collect enough
money from subscriptions and do the next step: remove the 3 months
window or worse go full closed source?
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 24.09.2008 00:00, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Yeah. I read this as 3 months after release n+1 is out, release n
becomes closed source. I'm wondering how long it will take for
forks to appear that will provide open source bug
David Legg wrote:
I've been examining the HTMLSerializer so that I can document it on Daisy.
Initially, I was confused about what config options could be used and
then it dawned on me that there are actually two different
implementations! The default is to use:
Good call Reinhard, thanks!
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
I've perused the developer mail archive and the svn log but not found
anything about the background for this second implementation.
See http://cocoon.markmail.org/message/z63kh2sx3u4spxo
No wonder I didn't find it... 2004 is ancient
First, let me say that I don't think the Spring policy is going to end
up being as bad as it was made out to be at first glance, although that
may just be wishful thinking. In any case, I think it is extremely
premature to talk about forking the code.
I think if you were to put yourself in
Ralph Goers wrote:
First, let me say that I don't think the Spring policy is going to end
up being as bad as it was made out to be at first glance, although that
may just be wishful thinking.
I have the same hopes but something tells me that it is only another
step into the direction of
Rainer Pruy wrote:
A clear statement along only the most current release will receive
maintenance efforts would have been much easier and clearer (and
would get broader acceptance by the community). That the whole thing
was not put that way contributes to the impression that users should
be
I'd doubt a petition by itself would make them change the policy.
Probably they no longer can afford time, money or other resource to support
community version of spring.
If they are trying to make a business out of it it is quite obvious that they
won't pop up asking for
someone to take over.
Hi,
The ApacheCon US 2008 conference is getting closer. If you are
interested in participating but would have a hard time financing the
trip, the Apache Travel Assistance Committee may be able to help you.
See below for their announcement about the financial support that the
Apache Software
10 matches
Mail list logo
