On 13.12.23 15:00, Cédric Damioli wrote:
Hi,
...
It's now time to formally vote:
[x] +1 accept (retire and officially stop the maintenance of 2.1/3.0
branches, only keeping 2.x)
[ ] -1 reject (explanation required)
Regards,
Jörg
On 2023/12/13 14:00:09 Cédric Damioli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following and according to last weeks' discussions, it seems that the
> general consensus would be to retire 2.1 (too old to be maintained) and
> 3.0 (too alpha to be maintained), and keep 2.x around for now.
>
> If I try to summarize
