Grzegorz Kossakowski napisał(a):
>
>> To get the mountPath, it is better to use the blockPath module e.g.
>> {block-path:ajax} (assuming that the cocoon-ajax-impl service servlet
>> is connected at the name ajax in the Spring config). You can also use
>> the service protocol inside the pipeline:
>>
Daniel Fagerstrom napisał(a):
You don't get that part, which show that there is a problem with my
design. I probably mounted the dispatcher servlet at "/*" while
developing the stuff :/ Thinking a little bit more about it, it would
probably better to let the servlet path of the dispatcher servl
Grzegorz Kossakowski skrev:
Daniel Fagerstrom napisał(a):
Daniel Fagerstrom skrev:
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
Hello,
I'm hacking now ajax and forms block to get them use of
servlet-services
and came across a bug. When you put ${cocoon.request.contextPath} into
JX template it w
Daniel Fagerstrom napisał(a):
> Daniel Fagerstrom skrev:
>> Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm hacking now ajax and forms block to get them use of
>>> servlet-services
>>> and came across a bug. When you put ${cocoon.request.contextPath} into
>>> JX template it will always return nu
Daniel Fagerstrom skrev:
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
Hello,
I'm hacking now ajax and forms block to get them use of servlet-services
and came across a bug. When you put ${cocoon.request.contextPath} into
JX template it will always return null (at least while using servlet
dispatcher). However,
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
Hello,
I'm hacking now ajax and forms block to get them use of servlet-services
and came across a bug. When you put ${cocoon.request.contextPath} into
JX template it will always return null (at least while using servlet
dispatcher). However, ${cocoon.request.requestUR
Hello,
I'm hacking now ajax and forms block to get them use of servlet-services
and came across a bug. When you put ${cocoon.request.contextPath} into
JX template it will always return null (at least while using servlet
dispatcher). However, ${cocoon.request.requestURI} returns valid value,
so it