Re: [PROPOSAL] Micro-Cocoon

2008-01-08 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Dec 30, 2007 5:35 PM, Reinhard Poetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... o make Cocoon pipelines/sitemaps ready for the usage in OSGi environments... The Sling project would very probably be interested in this. We're not there yet, but once we start working on different output renderings in

Re: [PROPOSAL] Micro-Cocoon

2008-01-01 Thread Michael Wechner
Sylvain Wallez wrote: Jeroen Reijn wrote: Reinhard, sounds like a good thing. I guess not only Indoqa will get a benefit out of this. Put it in the whiteboard, so if needed and possible other people can help out and perhaps join the discussion? +1 ! +1 Michael Sylvain

Re: [PROPOSAL] Micro-Cocoon

2007-12-31 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
How is this related to a final 2.2 release? Are we planning to release 2.2 soon? Before you start your work? Or is it the intension to put this into a final 2.2 as well? Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PROPOSAL] Micro-Cocoon

2007-12-31 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: How is this related to a final 2.2 release? Are we planning to release 2.2 soon? Yes, I want to work on the final release in the second week of January again. I can't say how much time I can dedicate to the release work, but I guess that we can ship the release by

[PROPOSAL] Micro-Cocoon

2007-12-30 Thread Reinhard Poetz
We at Indoqa have started to think about working on a slimmed down version of Cocoon 2.2 (Micro-Cocoon). By doing this we pursue a couple of goals: o increase the maintainability of Cocoon (Cocoon 2.2 is already a big improvement but still too complicated in some areas) o optimize

Re: [PROPOSAL] Micro-Cocoon

2007-12-30 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Reinhard Poetz pisze: We at Indoqa have started to think about working on a slimmed down version of Cocoon 2.2 (Micro-Cocoon). By doing this we pursue a couple of goals: snip what=obviously supported by me goals/ o aspect-oriented profiling of pipelines Could you elaborate on this? I

Re: [PROPOSAL] Micro-Cocoon

2007-12-30 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Reinhard Poetz skrev: We at Indoqa have started to think about working on a slimmed down version of Cocoon 2.2 (Micro-Cocoon). By doing this we pursue a couple of goals: o increase the maintainability of Cocoon (Cocoon 2.2 is already a big improvement but still too complicated in

Re: [PROPOSAL] Micro-Cocoon

2007-12-30 Thread Ralph Goers
Use the whiteboard. The only areas of concern I have is with regard to sub-sitemaps and resources. But I reserve judgment on that until I see what you come up with. Ralph Reinhard Poetz wrote: We at Indoqa have started to think about working on a slimmed down version of Cocoon 2.2

Re: [PROPOSAL] Micro-Cocoon

2007-12-30 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Ralph Goers pisze: Use the whiteboard. The only areas of concern I have is with regard to sub-sitemaps and resources. But I reserve judgment on that until I see what you come up with. Hi Ralph, When it comes to resources, we have a replacement for that already. Something similar to old

Re: [PROPOSAL] Micro-Cocoon

2007-12-30 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: o aspect-oriented profiling of pipelines Could you elaborate on this? I may not know all fashionable terminology. :-) My idea is that profiling should only be an aspect on pipeline processing. In 2.1/2.2 you have to use a different pipeline implementation for

Re: [PROPOSAL] Micro-Cocoon

2007-12-30 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Ralph Goers pisze: Use the whiteboard. The only areas of concern I have is with regard to sub-sitemaps and resources. But I reserve judgment on that until I see what you come up with. Hi Ralph, When it comes to resources, we have a replacement for that already.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Micro-Cocoon

2007-12-30 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Reinhard Poetz pisze: My idea is that profiling should only be an aspect on pipeline processing. In 2.1/2.2 you have to use a different pipeline implementation for profiling - I think we can do better. Ahh, got it. If we architect API of pipelines well we will be able to provide profiling

Re: [PROPOSAL] Micro-Cocoon

2007-12-30 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Reinhard Poetz pisze: My idea is that profiling should only be an aspect on pipeline processing. In 2.1/2.2 you have to use a different pipeline implementation for profiling - I think we can do better. Ahh, got it. If we architect API of pipelines well we will be

Re: [PROPOSAL] Micro-Cocoon

2007-12-30 Thread Jeroen Reijn
Reinhard, sounds like a good thing. I guess not only Indoqa will get a benefit out of this. Put it in the whiteboard, so if needed and possible other people can help out and perhaps join the discussion? Good luck! Regards, Jeroen Reijn Reinhard Poetz wrote: We at Indoqa have started

Re: [PROPOSAL] Micro-Cocoon

2007-12-30 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Jeroen Reijn wrote: Reinhard, sounds like a good thing. I guess not only Indoqa will get a benefit out of this. Put it in the whiteboard, so if needed and possible other people can help out and perhaps join the discussion? +1 ! Sylvain -- Sylvain Wallez - http://bluxte.net