DURDINA Michal wrote:
>
> Thanks for pointing me there.
>
> Inspite of that, my questions remain:
> 1. Why must I be dependent on the whole portal block (jar is
> 330kB and will be more) when I want to implement just one
> JSR-168 portlet using Cocoon and using 3rd party portlet container?
I
that code to src/java?
Thank you and appologize me :)
Michal
> -Original Message-
> From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 4:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Portal] Question: Why JSR-168 portlet impl moved?
>
&
See:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10771857645&r=1&w=2
Thanks
Carsten
> -Original Message-
> From: DURDINA Michal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 3:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Portal] Question: Why JSR-168 port
Hi,
I am curious why Carsten moved portlet implementation from scratchpad to portal
block... I thought JSR-168 portlet implementation would go to core.
I think that CocoonPortlet (JSR-168 portlet implementation) and portal block are two
different things.
CocoonPortlet makes cocoon applications
