Re: [RT] Starting 2.2 (was going to be "The Project Formerly KnownAs Cocoon")

2003-08-28 Thread Geoff Howard
Tony Collen wrote: Geoff Howard wrote: What about renaming the next release to an unpronounceable set of symbols, like Prince, or that Led Zepplin album? I'd suggest "!&#". How about: Cocoon It would be pronounced, "Cocoon?!" Actually, my proposal could be pronounced "bang and pound" which m

Re: [RT] Starting 2.2 (was going to be "The Project Formerly KnownAs Cocoon")

2003-08-28 Thread Tony Collen
Geoff Howard wrote: What about renaming the next release to an unpronounceable set of symbols, like Prince, or that Led Zepplin album? I'd suggest "!&#". How about: Cocoon It would be pronounced, "Cocoon?!" In all seriousness, I'm all for 2.2, but what sorts of loose ends are there that coul

Re: [RT] Starting 2.2 (was going to be "The Project Formerly KnownAs Cocoon")

2003-08-28 Thread Geoff Howard
Tony Collen wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Maybe start 2.5, just to be in line with Linux? ;-P Screw that, let's just skip a couple major versions, everyone's doing it now, how does "Cocoon 5.0" look? :) Better yet, let's just change the name alltogether: Cocoon XP Cocoon MX Cocoon MX 2004 I