Unico Hommes wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Torsten Curdt wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Unico Hommes wrote:
I tend to think the dependency is from session-fw on xsp, not the
other way around. Unless this becomes really difficult to
accomplish
I'd prefer keeping it the w
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Torsten Curdt wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Unico Hommes wrote:
I tend to think the dependency is from session-fw on xsp, not the
other way around. Unless this becomes really difficult to
accomplish
I'd prefer keeping it the way it is now.
Torsten Curdt wrote:
>
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > Unico Hommes wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I tend to think the dependency is from session-fw on xsp, not the
> >>other way around. Unless this becomes really difficult to
> accomplish
> >>I'd prefer keeping it the way it is now. I will do some
> rese
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Unico Hommes wrote:
I tend to think the dependency is from session-fw on xsp, not
the other way around. Unless this becomes really difficult to
accomplish I'd prefer keeping it the way it is now. I will do
some research as to what would be involved to change the
build
Unico Hommes wrote:
> >
> I tend to think the dependency is from session-fw on xsp, not
> the other way around. Unless this becomes really difficult to
> accomplish I'd prefer keeping it the way it is now. I will do
> some research as to what would be involved to change the
> build system to a
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
I have following problem, that
src/blocks/session-fw/conf/xsp-session-fw.xconf
depends on the xsp block, but won't be executed before the
patch files
of the xsp block :-/
This may require a change to the build system. Hmm.
What about moving *al
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Stephan Michels wrote:
Am Di, den 09.03.2004 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz um 16:37:
We should move XSP in a block anyway.
+1 from Stefano, Antonio, Reinhard
+0.5 (=good idea, won't be able to help)
I can offer some help, if nobody on it, then I can try it?!
Am Mi, den 10.03.2004 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler um 14:24:
> > >I have following problem, that
> > > src/blocks/session-fw/conf/xsp-session-fw.xconf
> > >depends on the xsp block, but won't be executed before the
> > patch files
> > >of the xsp block :-/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > This may requir
> >I have following problem, that
> > src/blocks/session-fw/conf/xsp-session-fw.xconf
> >depends on the xsp block, but won't be executed before the
> patch files
> >of the xsp block :-/
> >
> >
> >
>
> This may require a change to the build system. Hmm.
>
What about moving *all* xsp stuff in
Stephan Michels wrote:
Am Mi, den 10.03.2004 schrieb Reinhard Pötz um 11:03:
Stephan Michels wrote:
Am Di, den 09.03.2004 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz um 16:37:
We should move XSP in a block anyway.
+1 from Stefano, Antonio, Reinhard
+0.5 (=goo
Am Mi, den 10.03.2004 schrieb Reinhard Pötz um 11:03:
> Stephan Michels wrote:
>
> >Am Di, den 09.03.2004 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz um 16:37:
> >
> >
> We should move XSP in a block anyway.
>
>
> >>>+1 from Stefano, Antonio, Reinhard
> >>>
> >>>
> >>+0.5 (=good idea
Stephan Michels wrote:
Am Di, den 09.03.2004 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz um 16:37:
We should move XSP in a block anyway.
+1 from Stefano, Antonio, Reinhard
+0.5 (=good idea, won't be able to help)
I can offer some help, if nobody on it, then I can try it?!
Yes pls, this
12 matches
Mail list logo