Re: [VOTE] Consensus about documentation location - revised version

2005-06-14 Thread Unico Hommes
Linden H van der (MI) wrote: > Hi Bertrand, > > >>P.S. Helma, it seems like your mailer is breaking threads sometimes, >>but not always. For example, [2] starts a new thread although it is >>obviously a reply to [3]. If it's easy to fix it might be >>good for our >>archives. >> >>[2] >>http:

RE: [VOTE] Consensus about documentation location - revised version

2005-06-14 Thread Linden H van der (MI)
Hi Bertrand, > P.S. Helma, it seems like your mailer is breaking threads sometimes, > but not always. For example, [2] starts a new thread although it is > obviously a reply to [3]. If it's easy to fix it might be > good for our > archives. > > [2] > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoo

Re: [VOTE] Consensus about documentation location - revised version

2005-06-14 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le 13 juin 05, à 17:16, Linden H van der ((MI)) a écrit : Based on some comments I would like to revise the proposal... I'm fine with everything you suggest, just a few comments below. ...- this documentation is targeted at Cocoon 2.1. This means that we try to write version-independent doc

Re: [VOTE] Consensus about documentation location - revised version

2005-06-13 Thread Glen Ezkovich
On Jun 13, 2005, at 10:16 AM, Linden H van der (MI) wrote: Based on some comments I would like to revise the proposal. Let's focus first on what info goes where and what the general direction will be. As things progress, we can focus on explicit processes and, given the current discussion, th

Re: [VOTE] Consensus about documentation location - revised version

2005-06-13 Thread Ralph Goers
Linden H van der (MI) wrote: Based on some comments I would like to revise the proposal. Let's focus first on what info goes where and what the general direction will be. As things progress, we can focus on explicit processes and, given the current discussion, the roles/rights. - the current

RE: [VOTE] Consensus about documentation location - revised version

2005-06-13 Thread Linden H van der (MI)
Based on some comments I would like to revise the proposal. Let's focus first on what info goes where and what the general direction will be. As things progress, we can focus on explicit processes and, given the current discussion, the roles/rights. - the current Daisy site at the zones [1] will