Re: [VOTE] Remove IDL-Docs

Reinhard Poetz wrote: I propose to remove the IDL-docs because they are far from being up-to-date and the Flow-API is well-described in our usual docs. Here my +1. +1 Geoff

Re: [VOTE] Remove IDL-Docs

On 03.11.2003 13:29, Reinhard Poetz wrote: I propose to remove the IDL-docs because they are far from being up-to-date and the Flow-API is well-described in our usual docs. Here my +1. +1 Joerg

Re: [VOTE] Remove IDL-Docs

Le Lundi, 3 nov 2003, à 17:14 Europe/Zurich, Tony Collen a écrit : I propose to remove the IDL-docs because they are far from being up-to-date and the Flow-API is well-described in our usual docs. +1 -Bertrand

Re: [VOTE] Remove IDL-Docs

Giacomo Pati wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: I propose to remove the IDL-docs because they are far from being up-to-date and the Flow-API is well-described in our usual docs. Here my +1. +1 for me. +1 here, too Tony

Re: [VOTE] Remove IDL-Docs

Reinhard Poetz wrote: I propose to remove the IDL-docs because they are far from being up-to-date and the Flow-API is well-described in our usual docs. Here my +1. +1 for me. -- Giacomo Pati Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com

[VOTE] Remove IDL-Docs (was: Documenting the FOM)

I propose to remove the IDL-docs because they are far from being up-to-date and the Flow-API is well-described in our usual docs. Here my +1. -- Reinhard > -Original Message- > From: Reinhard Poetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 8:34 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECT