Re: [VOTE] Time format for access time.

On 1 May 2005, at 13:44, Sylvain Wallez wrote: Antonio Gallardo wrote: Hi: This is only related to the time format in the access output. Currently we use: Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 3.612 seconds. Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 3 milliseconds. New format (an ISO8601-like): P

Re: [VOTE] Time format for access time.

On Dom, 1 de Mayo de 2005, 10:31, Stefano Mazzocchi dijo: > Antonio Gallardo wrote: >> Hi: >> >> This is only related to the time format in the access output. Currently >> we >> use: >> >> Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 3.612 seconds. >> Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 3 millisecon

Re: [VOTE] Time format for access time.

Antonio Gallardo wrote: Hi: This is only related to the time format in the access output. Currently we use: Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 3.612 seconds. Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 3 milliseconds. New format (an ISO8601-like): Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 0:00:03.61

Re: [VOTE] Time format for access time.

Il giorno 01/mag/05, alle 14:38, Antonio Gallardo ha scritto: Hi: This is only related to the time format in the access output. Currently we use: Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 3.612 seconds. Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 3 milliseconds. New format (an ISO8601-like): Processed

Re: [VOTE] Time format for access time.

Antonio Gallardo wrote: Hi: This is only related to the time format in the access output. Currently we use: Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 3.612 seconds. Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 3 milliseconds. New format (an ISO8601-like): Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 0:00:03.61

[VOTE] Time format for access time.

Hi: This is only related to the time format in the access output. Currently we use: Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 3.612 seconds. Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 3 milliseconds. New format (an ISO8601-like): Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 0:00:03.612 Processed by Apach