Le Mardi, 9 mars 2004, à 14:14 Europe/Zurich, Sylvain Wallez a écrit :
- do you want to add an importance="high|low|medium" attribute on
in changes.xml?
+1
- do you want each block to have it's own status.xml file?
+0.5
(trying to be more precise in votes: I'm for it but cannot help ATM)
-Bertr
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
It seems that we need a place where we can put "important changes" for 2.1.5.
This is currently the renaming of woody to cocoon forms and the incompatible excalibur-logger change that might cause problems with existing installations.
Apart from putting it on the Wiki has
