Re: [summary][vote] Cocoon 3.0

2008-08-10 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
On Aug 10, 2008, at 4:19 PM, Reinhard Pötz wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: On Aug 10, 2008, at 4:19 AM, Reinhard Pötz wrote: Reinhard Pötz wrote: Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3. This means that any reference on Cor

Re: [summary][vote] Cocoon 3.0

2008-08-10 Thread Reinhard Pötz
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: On Aug 10, 2008, at 4:19 AM, Reinhard Pötz wrote: Reinhard Pötz wrote: Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3. This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package names, artifact ids, g

Re: [summary][vote] Cocoon 3.0

2008-08-10 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
On Aug 10, 2008, at 4:19 AM, Reinhard Pötz wrote: Reinhard Pötz wrote: Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3. This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package names, artifact ids, group ids or anywhere e

[summary][vote] Cocoon 3.0

2008-08-10 Thread Reinhard Pötz
Reinhard Pötz wrote: Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3. This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package names, artifact ids, group ids or anywhere else will be dropped and the standard Cocoon namespa

Re: [vote] Cocoon 3.0

2008-08-10 Thread Reinhard Pötz
Alfred Nathaniel wrote: On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 13:19 +0200, Reinhard Pötz wrote: Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3. This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package names, artifact ids, group ids or an

Re: [vote] Cocoon 3.0

2008-08-08 Thread Alfred Nathaniel
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 13:19 +0200, Reinhard Pötz wrote: > Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of > Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3. > > This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package names, > artifact ids, group ids or anywhere else will

Re: [vote] Cocoon 3.0

2008-08-08 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Reinhard Pötz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ...Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of Corona, I > propose Corona to become Cocoon 3 +1 -Bertrand

Re: [vote] Cocoon 3.0

2008-08-07 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
On Aug 6, 2008, at 7:19 AM, Reinhard Pötz wrote: Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3. This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package names, artifact ids, group ids or anywhere else will be dropped a

Re: [vote] Cocoon 3.0

2008-08-06 Thread Joerg Heinicke
Reinhard Pötz apache.org> writes: > Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of > Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3. +1 Joerg

Re: [vote] Cocoon 3.0

2008-08-06 Thread Ralph Goers
+1 Reinhard Pötz wrote: Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3. This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package names, artifact ids, group ids or anywhere else will be dropped and the standard Cocoon n

Re: [vote] Cocoon 3.0

2008-08-06 Thread Peter Hunsberger
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 6:19 AM, Reinhard Pötz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of Corona, I > propose Corona to become Cocoon 3. > +1 Seems a little weird but I certainly don't have any better alternatives. -- Peter Hunsberger

RE: [vote] Cocoon 3.0

2008-08-06 Thread Jasha Joachimsthal
> -Original Message- > From: Reinhard Pötz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: woensdag 6 augustus 2008 13:20 > To: dev@cocoon.apache.org > Subject: [vote] Cocoon 3.0 > > > Following the result of our recent discussion about the > future of Corona, I propos

Re: [vote] Cocoon 3.0

2008-08-06 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
+1 Carsten Reinhard Pötz wrote: Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3. This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package names, artifact ids, group ids or anywhere else will be dropped and the standard

Re: [vote] Cocoon 3.0

2008-08-06 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 13:19 +0200, Reinhard Pötz wrote: > Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of > Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3. +1 salu2 -- Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org Open Source Java

Re: [vote] Cocoon 3.0

2008-08-06 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Reinhard Pötz skrev: Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3. This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package names, artifact ids, group ids or anywhere else will be dropped and the standard Cocoon namespa

Re: [vote] Cocoon 3.0

2008-08-06 Thread Andrew Savory
Hi 2008/8/6 Reinhard Pötz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of Corona, I > propose Corona to become Cocoon 3. +1 (The king is dead, long live the king!) Andrew. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.andrewsavory.com/

Re: [vote] Cocoon 3.0

2008-08-06 Thread Felix Knecht
Reinhard Pötz schrieb: Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3. +1 Felix

[vote] Cocoon 3.0

2008-08-06 Thread Reinhard Pötz
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3. This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package names, artifact ids, group ids or anywhere else will be dropped and the standard Cocoon namespace org.apache.cocoon