On Aug 10, 2008, at 4:19 PM, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
On Aug 10, 2008, at 4:19 AM, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
This means that any reference on Cor
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
On Aug 10, 2008, at 4:19 AM, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package
names, artifact ids, g
On Aug 10, 2008, at 4:19 AM, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package
names, artifact ids, group ids or anywhere e
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package names,
artifact ids, group ids or anywhere else will be dropped and the
standard Cocoon namespa
Alfred Nathaniel wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 13:19 +0200, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package names,
artifact ids, group ids or an
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 13:19 +0200, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
> Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
> Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
>
> This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package names,
> artifact ids, group ids or anywhere else will
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Reinhard Pötz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ...Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of Corona, I
> propose Corona to become Cocoon 3
+1
-Bertrand
On Aug 6, 2008, at 7:19 AM, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package
names, artifact ids, group ids or anywhere else will be dropped a
Reinhard Pötz apache.org> writes:
> Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
> Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
+1
Joerg
+1
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package
names, artifact ids, group ids or anywhere else will be dropped and
the standard Cocoon n
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 6:19 AM, Reinhard Pötz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of Corona, I
> propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
>
+1
Seems a little weird but I certainly don't have any better alternatives.
--
Peter Hunsberger
> -Original Message-
> From: Reinhard Pötz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: woensdag 6 augustus 2008 13:20
> To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> Subject: [vote] Cocoon 3.0
>
>
> Following the result of our recent discussion about the
> future of Corona, I propos
+1
Carsten
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package names,
artifact ids, group ids or anywhere else will be dropped and the
standard
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 13:19 +0200, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
> Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
> Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
+1
salu2
--
Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org
Open Source Java
Reinhard Pötz skrev:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package
names, artifact ids, group ids or anywhere else will be dropped and
the standard Cocoon namespa
Hi
2008/8/6 Reinhard Pötz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of Corona, I
> propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
+1
(The king is dead, long live the king!)
Andrew.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.andrewsavory.com/
Reinhard Pötz schrieb:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
+1
Felix
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package names,
artifact ids, group ids or anywhere else will be dropped and the
standard Cocoon namespace org.apache.cocoon
18 matches
Mail list logo