Alfred Nathaniel wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 13:19 +0200, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package names,
artifact ids, group ids or
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package names,
artifact ids, group ids or anywhere else will be dropped and the
standard Cocoon
On Aug 10, 2008, at 4:19 AM, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package
names, artifact ids, group ids or anywhere
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
On Aug 10, 2008, at 4:19 AM, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package
names, artifact ids,
On Aug 10, 2008, at 4:19 PM, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
On Aug 10, 2008, at 4:19 AM, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
This means that any reference on
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Reinhard Pötz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of Corona, I
propose Corona to become Cocoon 3
+1
-Bertrand
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 13:19 +0200, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package names,
artifact ids, group ids or anywhere else will be
On Aug 6, 2008, at 7:19 AM, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package
names, artifact ids, group ids or anywhere else will be dropped
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package names,
artifact ids, group ids or anywhere else will be dropped and the
standard Cocoon namespace
Reinhard Pötz schrieb:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
+1
Felix
Hi
2008/8/6 Reinhard Pötz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of Corona, I
propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
+1
(The king is dead, long live the king!)
Andrew.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.andrewsavory.com/
Reinhard Pötz skrev:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package
names, artifact ids, group ids or anywhere else will be dropped and
the standard Cocoon
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 13:19 +0200, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
+1
salu2
--
Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org
Open Source Java
+1
Carsten
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package names,
artifact ids, group ids or anywhere else will be dropped and the
-Original Message-
From: Reinhard Pötz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 6 augustus 2008 13:20
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: [vote] Cocoon 3.0
Following the result of our recent discussion about the
future of Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 6:19 AM, Reinhard Pötz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of Corona, I
propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
+1
Seems a little weird but I certainly don't have any better alternatives.
--
Peter Hunsberger
+1
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
This means that any reference on Corona in source files, package
names, artifact ids, group ids or anywhere else will be dropped and
the standard Cocoon
Reinhard Pötz reinhard at apache.org writes:
Following the result of our recent discussion about the future of
Corona, I propose Corona to become Cocoon 3.
+1
Joerg
18 matches
Mail list logo
